Hi,
Tara Milana <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> My particular problem was with compiling gdk-pixbuf, I posted the
> problem earlier.
As outlined in http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103708 your
problem to compile gdk-pixbuf is a version incompatibility with your
binutils and you can hardly
On Sun, 2003-10-19 at 07:23, Sven Neumann wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As outlined in http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103708 your
> problem to compile gdk-pixbuf is a version incompatibility with your
> binutils and you can hardly blame the GTK+ developers for this.
Perhaps this should be in the pe
Hi,
Michael Torrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > As outlined in http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103708 your
> > problem to compile gdk-pixbuf is a version incompatibility with your
> > binutils and you can hardly blame the GTK+ developers for this.
>
> Perhaps this should be in the p
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Michael Torrie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
As outlined in http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=103708 your
problem to compile gdk-pixbuf is a version incompatibility with your
binutils and you can hardly blame the GTK+ developers for this.
Perhaps this should be in th
Hi,
Russell Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Any version incompatibilities should be handled in the relevant
> configure.ac.
We are talking about incompatibilies between the linker and installed
libraries. This is completely out of the realm of GTK+.
Sven
___
I need some help to compile gtk 2.0 to the Simputer handheld
Geykel
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Shopping - with improved product search
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Russell Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Any version incompatibilities should be handled in the relevant
configure.ac.
We are talking about incompatibilies between the linker and installed
libraries. This is completely out of the realm of GTK+.
You could make an autoconf m
Hi,
Russell Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> You could make an autoconf macro to check the ld.so version from
> ldconfig -V.
And how would I know that the user has libraries installed that are
linked with a different and incompatible linker? The problem is not
that GTK+ would depend on a speci
Sven Neumann wrote:
Hi,
Russell Shaw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
You could make an autoconf macro to check the ld.so version from
ldconfig -V.
And how would I know that the user has libraries installed that are
linked with a different and incompatible linker? The problem is not
that GTK+ would de
>I don't recall the specific error, but to test that libraries work,
>an autoconf macro can compile and run a small program using a specific
>library to see if it works. Autoconf macros can be specific to each
>platform and/or test for all known implementations of ld to get a
>version number.
that
Paul Davis wrote:
I don't recall the specific error, but to test that libraries work,
an autoconf macro can compile and run a small program using a specific
library to see if it works. Autoconf macros can be specific to each
platform and/or test for all known implementations of ld to get a
version
>I assume some pre-existing libraries were linked with an older linker,
>then a newer linker was installed? The only solution in that case is
>for users to know the meaning of:
> /usr/i386-pc-linux/bin/ld: anonymous version tag cannot be combined
> with other version
On Mon, 2003-10-20 at 00:22, Paul Davis wrote:
> >I assume some pre-existing libraries were linked with an older linker,
> >then a newer linker was installed? The only solution in that case is
> >for users to know the meaning of:
> > /usr/i386-pc-linux/bin/ld: anonymous version tag cannot be comb
13 matches
Mail list logo
