Upgrade to 2.4.9

2004-10-04 Thread J L
Hi; I upgrade GTK to version 2.4.9 on mandrake, but when I check for the used version, I get 2.2.4. And when I tried to install the gimp, it says 2.2.4 is used, but 2.4.9 is there too. How could I configure the system to use the new version instead of 2.2.4? Thanks. _

Re: Big problem now Michael Torrie >_0

2004-10-04 Thread Michael L Torrie
On Sun, 2004-10-03 at 14:28 -0700, Hudson T. Clark wrote: > Ok well I picked the advice that resulted in replacing my older > version of glib with the newer one… everything seemed to go fine until > I started fooling around with pango! Now I used removepkg on the old > pango and installed the new p

Re: Upgrade to 2.4.9

2004-10-04 Thread Michael L Torrie
On Sun, 2004-10-03 at 17:32 +, J L wrote: > Hi; > I upgrade GTK to version 2.4.9 on mandrake, but when I check for the used > version, I get 2.2.4. And when I tried to install the gimp, it says 2.2.4 is > used, but 2.4.9 is there too. > How could I configure the system to use the new version

Re: Upgrade to 2.4.9

2004-10-04 Thread David Necas (Yeti)
On Mon, Oct 04, 2004 at 08:45:10AM -0600, Michael L Torrie wrote: > > You have to configure and install the newer gtk libraries to /usr, where > they overwrite the old system libraries. Of course if you do this, you > run the risk of breaking things (see other post on this today!). I'd not recom

Re: Accelerators don't work

2004-10-04 Thread edscott wilson garcia
El mié, 29-09-2004 a las 10:46, Pramod Patangay escribió: > Hi All, > > I am trying to add accelerators to menu items. But > they don't seem to work as they should. There's a > menuitem which when activated will hide the menu bar. > But once the menu bar is hidden, none of the > accelerators work.

Any plans for a SpinButton cell renderer for GtkTreeView?

2004-10-04 Thread Daniel Kasak
As subject suggests, I'd be delighted to have a SpinButton cell renderer for GtkTreeView. I'm programming with Gtk2-Perl, and I'm using a custom cell renderer that does what I need, but if you have any more than a couple of rows of data, it's *very* slow indeed. Should I create a 'feature reque