i recently installed the latest gtk+ 2.8.6 and related dependencies on a
fedora core 3 machine. even compiling/running the simple base program
results in:
[EMAIL PROTECTED] ~]$ base
base: error while loading shared libraries: libpangocairo-1.0.so.0:
cannot openshared object file: No such file
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 20:36:41 +0800
Xyber Blue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Yes, the gtk buttons displays english. It did not display japanese
I suppose the font size is different (larger than that in
the case of LANG=C), right?
___
gtk-list mailing l
Yes, the gtk buttons displays english. It did not display japaneseOn 10/25/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Possibly, the root of terminology confusion isthe usage of the word X-server, as Mr. Tor pointed.We had better use real program name on FR-V insteadof "X-server". /usr/X1
Possibly, the root of terminology confusion is
the usage of the word X-server, as Mr. Tor pointed.
We had better use real program name on FR-V instead
of "X-server". /usr/X11R6/bin/X is enough?
If my guess is right...
Mr. Tor and me agree that /usr/X11R6/bin/X on FR-V is
configured to display Jap
So does it mean that our X-server is capable of displaying japanese fonts???
When we tried to rename the /usr/X11R6/lib/X11/fonts from the FRV which
is accessing the host PCs dillo application using x-server of FRV,
dillo can display japanese fonts. So Mr Tor has a point that it is not
using the f
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Petr Tomasek
> Sent: 25 October 2005 11:56
> To: gtk-list@gnome.org
> Subject: Re: so,is this claim about pango still true? or does
> nobody actually care?
>
> On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 08:47:38AM +0300
On Fri, Oct 14, 2005 at 08:47:38AM +0300, Tommi Komulainen wrote:
> On 10/14/05, Paul Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > is this still true? does anybody care? is there a way to avoid pango
> > entirely and still get AA fonts inside GTK2? will this ever be fixed
> > before everyone is using h
Xyber Blue writes:
> So it understood that the x-server from which the application
> displayed is from our target system, not the PC host system.
The X server is what directly controls the display in question.
> By the way, we follow the steps on what Mr Suzuki said. We tried to run
> dillo w
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 17:07:29 +0800
Xyber Blue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Thanks for the info Mr Tor, I was really amazed about this and have not
>expected this capability of the X-Server. So it understood that the x-server
>from which the application displayed is from our target system, not the P
Thanks for the info Mr Tor, I was really amazed about this and
have not expected this capability of the X-Server. So it understood
that the x-server from which the application displayed is from our
target system, not the PC host system.
By the way, we follow the steps on what Mr Suzuki said. We
Xyber Blue writes:
> When we try some testgtk from PC, it display in our target and we can't
> pipoint exactly the x-server it used.
The X server used is the one controlling the display where the windows
appear. See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/X_Window_System
Many people get confused by the te
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 16:13:42 +0800
Xyber Blue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>When we try some testgtk from PC, it display in our target and we can't
>pipoint exactly the x-server it used. Did it used our cross compiled
>x-server for our target or still it uses the host PC X-server. Im really
>amazed a
By the way, sorry my mistake. I have testgtk for the target and I thought fontset.c has different behavior from testgtk.
By the way, I have a question. Im just wondering what X server did our
FRV used when I followed the steps to run remotely the X Server from
the host PC.
When we try some testgt
On Tue, 25 Oct 2005 14:59:17 +0800
Xyber Blue <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Currently, our project is embedded Linux systems running on Fujitsu FR-V
>target board. Meaning, this Linux and its applications are being cross
>compiled so that the executables can be run on the target hardware.
>We also
14 matches
Mail list logo
