Hey all,
I just spent three hours compiling gtk+ and all of it's dependencies
(whoo!). I had gotten the impression that support for Mac OSX without
using X11 was built into gtk+. Was I wrong? I can compile and run the
example program from the 2.0 tutorial fine in X11, but outside of it I
get:
Gtk
On Sat, 2007-02-03 at 23:30 +0200, Dov Grobgeld wrote:
>
> cairotwisted.c is really neat! Now we can write on warped surfaces.
> :-) There seems to be a bug though in the rendering of the O of the
> central WOW. It looks almost like the two inner nodes of all the
> bezier curves on the outside of
Thanks for the help Owen and Behdad. Indeed
pango_cairo_show_layout_line() was what I was looking for. The
documentation even describes the functionality! Thanks.
cairotwisted.c is really neat! Now we can write on warped surfaces.
:-) There seems to be a bug though in the rendering of the O of the
On Sat, Feb 03, 2007 at 12:34:24PM -0500, zentara wrote:
>
> I'll post this in case anyone in the future searches the archives
> for an answer.
For the case anyone finds this, a correction...
You can't fool C. The literal without an `l' suffix is
a double literal. The compiler creates a floati
Also check pango/examples/cairotwisted.c for some interesting stuff you
can do with pangocairo.
behdad
On Sat, 2007-02-03 at 21:48 +0200, Dov Grobgeld wrote:
> I'm trying to understand how to get the baseline information from a
> single line PangoLayout or equivalently a PangoLayoutLine.
>
> Mo
On Sat, 2007-02-03 at 14:59 -0500, Owen Taylor wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-02-03 at 21:48 +0200, Dov Grobgeld wrote:
> > I
> > In pango_cairo_show_layout() on the other hand, the layout logical
> > upper left corner is aligned at the current cairo point when drawing,
> > and I could not find any PangoLay
On Sat, 2007-02-03 at 21:48 +0200, Dov Grobgeld wrote:
> I
> In pango_cairo_show_layout() on the other hand, the layout logical
> upper left corner is aligned at the current cairo point when drawing,
> and I could not find any PangoLayout call that gets the distance from
> the top of the logical re
I'm trying to understand how to get the baseline information from a
single line PangoLayout or equivalently a PangoLayoutLine.
More concretely I would like to translate the following postscript
program into Pango/Cairo:
%!
1.0 0 0 setrgbcolor
100 100 moveto
150 0 rlineto stroke
100 100
I have installed gtk2 on windows. but if i want to compile with g++ it does
niot find the header files.
so my be the paths are not correct.
I tried it to modify several times but without results.
how does i do that the g++ can find it correct?
best greetings
Ralf___
On Sat, 3 Feb 2007 01:46:08 +0100
David Nečas (Yeti) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>On Fri, Feb 02, 2007 at 04:14:09PM -0800, Sergei Steshenko wrote:
>>
>> You can still use explicit cast, i.e.
>>
>> ((long double)G_PI)
>>
>> , can't you?
>
>If you can demonstrate a program that gets the value of
taken, in context, from the following page: http://
developer.gnome.org/doc/API/2.0/glib/glib-resources.html
There are several mailing lists dedicated to GTK+ and related
libraries. Discussion of GLib generally takes place on these lists.
You can subscribe or view the archives of these lists
On Sat, 3 Feb 2007 13:31:57 +0200
Tor Lillqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Just feeling for the limits of what I can do given the contraints
> > of the language.
>
>And how is that related to GTK+?
Well Gtk+ is based on Glib. The Glib header defined the accuracy
of G_PI to 50 decimal places.
> Just feeling for the limits of what I can do given the contraints
> of the language.
And how is that related to GTK+?
> I like to think about things like using the center of the earth as
> an origin, and using a spherical coordinate system to locate
> points(and/or areas volumes) on the su
On Sat, 3 Feb 2007 03:48:39 +0200
Tor Lillqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Before this discussion gets any further, maybe the original poster
>could tell us what he intends to *do* with the highly accurate value
>of pi he is after? I am certainly no expert on numerical computation,
>but I know th
Hi Sergei,
On Fri, 2 Feb 2007 16:14:09 -0800 (PST) you wrote:
> You can still use explicit cast, i.e.
>
> ((long double)G_PI)
>
> , can't you ? Even without the trail 'l' you have correctly suggested to
> add.
You can, but would it work? AIUI the C standard only requires that to result in
a lo
15 matches
Mail list logo
