GTK+ 2.24.9 is now available for download at:
ftp://ftp.gtk.org/pub/gtk/2.24/
http://download.gnome.org/sources/gtk+/2.24/
84204bf24cac739fd979943127e7b29cb46b1017684aa24dce630faa01bcb61d
gtk+-2.24.9.tar.xz
This is a bug fix release in the stable 2.24 series.
GTK+ is a multi-pla
Well, we have not yet ascertained whether the problem is in the
documentation or in the code.
If there is a replacement function, then yes, it should be mentioned
in the documentation.
On the other hand, if there is no replacement function then it is not
really a bug in the documentation, it is m
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 11:33:07AM -0300, salsaman wrote:
> Dear Olav,
> How do you know it is a bug ?
You said you needed more documentation or that the documentation is not
clear enough. I responded that you need to file a bugreport. I don't get
why you question the need to file a bugreport to i
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 09:56:01AM -0500, Paul Davis wrote:
> olav is being subtly sarcastic. what he's really trying to say is that
I just don't get if he is actually ignoring my advice on purpose or
something else.
--
Regards,
Olav
___
gtk-list maili
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 9:33 AM, salsaman wrote:
> Dear Olav,
> How do you know it is a bug ?
olav is being subtly sarcastic. what he's really trying to say is that
the people who work on GTK development tend to be *much* more
responsive to things being reported at bugzilla.gnome.org than on this
Dear Olav,
How do you know it is a bug ?
Regards,
Salsaman.
http://lives.sourceforge.net
https://www.ohloh.net/accounts/salsaman
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 03:25, Olav Vitters wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 12:58:25AM -0300, salsaman wrote:
>> I hope you all see now. This is exactly what I me
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 11:36:14PM +, Jon Pisani wrote:
> I am trying to install Ettercap 0.7.4 on my Backtrack 5 R1 box. One of the
> dependencies is glib 2.0.0 or greater. I successfully installed it with no
> errors, but when I go to install other dependencies that require glib, I get
> t
