gtk3 win32 customize default theme

2014-05-07 Thread Andrea Zagli
how can i customize the default win32 theme without rebuilt gtk3? particularly i want to enable alternate rules in gtktreeview thanks in advance ___ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list

Re: gtk3 win32 customize default theme

2014-05-07 Thread LRN
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07.05.2014 13:34, Andrea Zagli wrote: > how can i customize the default win32 theme without rebuilt gtk3? > The same way you change GTK+-3.x theme on other platforms. Edit %LOCALAPPDATA%/gtk-3.0/gtk.css Note that this will *add* to the default the

A bug or a screw up?

2014-05-07 Thread Chris Moller
I just did a good-size upgrade I'd been putting off for too long that took me from GTK 3.2 to GTK 3.10.8, and some stuff that used to work doesn't any more: Basically, I have a window that contains a vbox that contans a label another label a drawing area a

Re: A bug or a screw up?

2014-05-07 Thread LRN
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07.05.2014 17:22, Chris Moller wrote: > I just did a good-size upgrade I'd been putting off for too long that took > me from GTK 3.2 to GTK 3.10.8, and some stuff that used to work doesn't > any more: > > Basically, I have a window that contains >

Re: A bug or a screw up?

2014-05-07 Thread Chris Moller
Hadn't been, but I just tried it. The result was that the entire da is drawn, but still in the wrong place. It's still aligned with the top of the vbox, overlays label 1 and label 2, and there's still a big gap between the bottom of the da and the top of label 3. It looks to me like the cr

Re: A bug or a screw up?

2014-05-07 Thread LRN
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 On 07.05.2014 17:46, Chris Moller wrote: > On 05/07/14 09:30, LRN wrote: >> On 07.05.2014 17:22, Chris Moller wrote: >>> I just did a good-size upgrade I'd been putting off for too long that >>> took me from GTK 3.2 to GTK 3.10.8, and some stuff that u

Re: A bug or a screw up?

2014-05-07 Thread Nicola Fontana
Il Wed, 07 May 2014 09:22:48 -0400 Chris Moller scrisse: > Is there something new I'm missing? It didn't used to work that way. Hi, I just removed what seems wrong to me (cairo_identity_matrix) and it appears to work the way you want. Ciao. -- Nicola _

Re: A bug or a screw up?

2014-05-07 Thread Chris Moller
Yep, that did it. And to think I stuck that in just to guarantee a known initial condition... Still, It didn't used to work that way, and I'm not sure it should, but I'll leave that to the maintainers. Thanks a lot--I've been tearing my hair for three days over this. On 05/07/14 12:50, Nic

Re: A bug or a screw up?

2014-05-07 Thread Emmanuele Bassi
hi Chris; it worked in the past by "accident": every widget had its own cairo context. in GTK+ 3.10 we changed that so that every widget shared the same cairo surface and context, and the ::draw() signal always got the context with the correct clip and transformation matrix appropriate for it. if

Re: A bug or a screw up?

2014-05-07 Thread Chris Moller
Thanks for the links, which explain a couple other oddnesses I've found since I went to 3.10. Chris On 05/07/14 13:26, Emmanuele Bassi wrote: hi Chris; it worked in the past by "accident": every widget had its own cairo context. in GTK+ 3.10 we changed that so that every widget shared the sam