[PATCH] Re: Building gtk+ 2.10.2 without cups or complete printing support

The first diff is to prevent the cups module directory from being included into the set of printing backends to be built, and the second diff ensures that everybody thinks we don't have cups. On 8/30/06, Andreas Wuest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Since gtk+ 2.10 seems to require a

Building gtk+ 2.10.2 without cups or complete printing support

Hi Since gtk+ 2.10 seems to require a decent revision of cups, I'd like to build it without cups support, if this is possible. If not, I could also do without printing support at all. I'm not sure though about the correct configure option. It would be nice if somebody could tell me what I should

Re: theme engines local to a user [solved]

Hi On 5/9/05, Andreas Wuest <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I am running gnome 2.6.2 on an x86, to which I do not have > administrative access. Nevertheless, I'd like to run an other theme > than the ones installed. [ snip ] > Now I am running pretty much out of ideas. I

theme engines local to a user

Hi I am running gnome 2.6.2 on an x86, to which I do not have administrative access. Nevertheless, I'd like to run an other theme than the ones installed. Installing the additional themes in ${HOME}/.themes worked flawlessly, but the trouble sets in when one of the themes tries to use another eng