Static compile of gtk+-2.2.4 on RH7.3

2004-02-02 Thread Gwendolynn ferch Elydyr
Hola! I'm trying to compile a static version of gtk+ 2.2.4 under RedHat 7.3, using gcc 2.9.6. I've used "./configure --enable-static=gtk+", and have PKG_CONFIG=/usr/local/bin/pkg-config PKG_CONFIG_PATH=/usr/local/lib/pkgconfig:/usr/lib/pkgconfig/:/usr/X11R6/lib/pkgconfig

Re: Static compile of gtk+-2.2.4 on RH7.3

2004-02-02 Thread Gwendolynn ferch Elydyr
ry `/usr/local/src/voip/gtk+-2.2.4/gtk/stock-icons' make[2]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/voip/gtk+-2.2.4/gtk' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/usr/local/src/voip/gtk+-2.2.4' make: *** [all-recursiv

Re: Static compile of gtk+-2.2.4 on RH7.3

2004-02-02 Thread Gwendolynn ferch Elydyr
On Mon, 2 Feb 2004, Aaron Neerenberg wrote: > Hmm. I took a look at my makefiles. You might try also using the > --disable-modules flag to configure. If it helps any, I call configure > as follows (note: this is being done from within a wrapper makefile.): > > ${TOOL}: > echo Installati

Re: Static compile of gtk+-2.2.4 on RH7.3

2004-02-02 Thread Gwendolynn ferch Elydyr
Hrm. It looks like somewhere in my meandering, /usr/local/lib fell out of my LD_LIBRARY_PATH. Adding it back in seems to have cleared this up. cheers! On Mon, 2 Feb 2004, Gwendolynn ferch Elydyr wrote: > On Mon, 2 Feb 2004, Aaron Neerenberg wrote: > > Hmm. I took a look at my makefi

Re: Static compile of gtk+-2.2.4 on RH7.3

2004-02-02 Thread Gwendolynn ferch Elydyr
On Mon, 2 Feb 2004, Gwendolynn ferch Elydyr wrote: That's definitely gotten me much further ahead. Now it's just barfing on a module check [why it's checking I'm not quite sure...]: > > ./configure --disable-shared --disable-xim --disable-modules --with-included-loaders=ani,

Lost text [still Re: Static compile of gtk+-2.2.4 on RH7.3]

2004-02-02 Thread Gwendolynn ferch Elydyr
On Mon, 2 Feb 2004, Gwendolynn ferch Elydyr wrote: > ... and replying to my own message again, no - it's not cleared up at all, > but runing make again, without doing a "make clean" results in things > just picking up and keeping right on going, happily. This makes me >