ring the
state, like sorting --in case of a sortable -- or selection details),
then that's fine from the application developer's point of view.
> As for the model-should-be-view-ignorant issues, they have nothing to
> do with transactions, but are just as valid concerns of cours
On Sat, 2007-08-04 at 16:51 -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
> On Sat, 2007-08-04 at 17:00 +0200, Philip Van Hoof wrote:
>
> > The model itself is the source. The view is just a viewer for it. The
> > source itself doesn't change. The content of the source changes. The
> > v
e with this: you know where to
find me and you know that I'm interested in helping with this if
necessary.
> All connected views/models could then process the
> full changeset in one pass. (Possibly this could also add/remove ranges
> of nodes, etc).
Thanks for your hard wo
