:
https://github.com/dieterv/legacynativebuilds/downloads
Building 2.24.6 is on my TODO list (don't seem to have received a
release announcement for this one?). I've volunteered to continue
maintenance
for these MinGW builds for GTK+ 2.24 only, because there's still loads
of
software out
On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 08:34:41 +0200, Anders Broman wrote:
Hi,
Has the provision of binary bundles for Windows 32 bit and 64 bit
been discontinued?
Yes, Tor (maintainer of the Windows binaries and GTK+ bundle) has
stepped down some time ago:
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 09:14:13 +0100, John Emmas wrote:
I was thinking of setting aside some time to investigate this but
A lot of people will thank you if you do :)
then I noticed that gtk is now up to version 2.24. I just wondered
if
the problem is fixed in 2.24 - or if anyone else knows
On Tue, 13 Sep 2011 11:18:50 +0100, John Emmas wrote:
Thanks Dieter. I was particularly interested to read that apparently
this did once work. Also, the fact that it can be made to work after
a fashion by using 'gtk_drag_source_set() / dest_set()' instead of
the
official
On Fri, 9 Sep 2011 10:08:32 +0100, Sam Thursfield wrote:
On Thu, Sep 8, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Dieter Verfaillie
diet...@optionexplicit.be wrote:
On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 14:18:41 +0100, Sam Thursfield wrote:
Maybe it would be a good idea to stop insisting our
beloved GNOME platform should only have 1
On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 09:50:42 +0200, Marek Kozlowski wrote:
I'm afraid I'm dumb cause I still don't understand :-(
Don't despair just yet! It's just that the techniques used
in Gtk's TreeView might not seem obvious at first. Looking
at the parts that matter most for us application developers,
On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 10:15:48 +0200, Kean Johnston wrote:
Dieter has been speaking with the gtk developers on IRC, and has
been
Would it be inappripriate to ask that that type of discussion happens
on the mailing list? Unless IRC logs are stored, they are ephemeral,
can't be searched or referred
On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 10:54:16 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
On 2011-09-08 at 10:46, dieterv wrote:
But I won't be doing this on github anymore (I've used up all the
space I'm
allowed to use), so it will move to my domain (optionexplicit.be)
whenever
the next release is built (even switched
On Thu, 08 Sep 2011 12:09:55 +0200, dieterv wrote:
For GTK+ 3 and future releases: nothing has been set in stone, I'm
open to whatever consensus is reached, whether it'll be:
- continuing with Tor's build scripts like I did above for 2.24.X
- build script for a mingw-get-able repository
- OBS
On Thu, 8 Sep 2011 11:30:36 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi wrote:
On 2011-09-08 at 12:09, dieterv wrote:
- a place to store the built binaries and GTK+ bundle
used to be http://ftp.gnome.org/pub/GNOME/binaries/win32/
linked to from http://www.gtk.org/download/win32.php
the newer
especially for
your project and the .msi a full fledged installer, giving your users
the choice of how they want to install your project on their machines.
There's a start to such a thing here:
https://github.com/dieterv/pygtk-installer/blob/master/bin/build_installer.py
and comparable things have
On Fri, 09 Sep 2011 00:12:09 +1200, John Stowers wrote:
It takes a build description file like:
https://github.com/dieterv/pygtk-installer/blob/master/wix/2.24.0.win32.xml
downloads required files, extracts them, applies transformations if
requested,
repacks, etc until finally a .msi
12 matches
Mail list logo
