On Thu, Jul 5, 2012 at 4:30 PM, Chris Vine wrote:
On Thu, 05 Jul 2012 18:45:25 +0200
Martin Schlemmer martin.schlem...@nwu.ac.za wrote:
Anyhow, I am now aware of the problem, but for sake of legacy code
that might still use gdk_threads_init(), should I file a bug with the
patch, or maybe to
On Fri, 6 Jul 2012 07:29:18 -0400
Earnie Boyd ear...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
[snip]
It may depend on which compiler, the compiler version and whose
distribution of that compiler is being used. Are you using MSVC to
build or are you using GCC? If the later it would help to know which
On Fri, Jul 6, 2012 at 8:31 AM, Chris Vine ch...@cvine.freeserve.co.uk wrote:
On Fri, 6 Jul 2012 07:29:18 -0400
Earnie Boyd ear...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
[snip]
It may depend on which compiler, the compiler version and whose
distribution of that compiler is being used. Are you using
On Fri, 6 Jul 2012 08:53:51 -0400
Earnie Boyd ear...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
But if it can work just by changing options of GCC or GCC distribution
would it not be beneficial to ...
It can't.
Chris
___
gtk-list mailing list
gtk-list@gnome.org
On Wed, 04 Jul 2012 13:18:18 +0200
Martin Schlemmer martin.schlem...@nwu.ac.za wrote:
On 7/4/2012 at 10:30 AM, Chris Vine ch...@cvine.freeserve.co.uk
wrote:
[snip]
GTK+/GDK has never been thread-safe on Win32. If the GDK global
lock
appeared to work for you in the past you just got lucky.
On Thu, 05 Jul 2012 18:45:25 +0200
Martin Schlemmer martin.schlem...@nwu.ac.za wrote:
Anyhow, I am now aware of the problem, but for sake of legacy code
that might still use gdk_threads_init(), should I file a bug with the
patch, or maybe to at least one to add a warning/abort in
On Tue, 03 Jul 2012 20:59:11 +0200
Martin Schlemmer martin.schlem...@nwu.ac.za wrote:
Hi,
Bit long, sorry.
I build my own GTK+ stack with MinGW (TDM-4.6.1) and have been using
2.16 and Glib 2.28 (with Gtk2-Perl bindings mostly) for a long time,
then switched to GTK+ 2.24 when that started
On 7/4/2012 at 4:41 AM, Damon Register dregis...@clear.net wrote:
On 7/3/2012 2:59 PM, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
I build my own GTK+ stack with MinGW (TDM-4.6.1) and have been using 2.16
I am just curious. When you built Glib with mingw, did you use the usual
configure, make? If so, what
On 7/4/2012 at 10:30 AM, Chris Vine ch...@cvine.freeserve.co.uk
wrote:
On Tue, 03 Jul 2012 20:59:11 +0200
Martin Schlemmer martin.schlem...@nwu.ac.za wrote:
Hi,
Bit long, sorry.
I build my own GTK+ stack with MinGW (TDM-4.6.1) and have been
using
2.16 and Glib 2.28 (with Gtk2-Perl
hi Martin;
gtk developers don't really follow this mailing list; if you want to
get feedback on a gtk patch you should mail gtk-devel-list, and open a
bug in bugzilla:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/enter_bug.cgi?product=gtk%2B
you should also hop on in the #gtk+ IRC channel on irc.gnome.org, and
On 7/4/2012 at 1:36 PM, Emmanuele Bassi eba...@gmail.com wrote:
hi Martin;
gtk developers don't really follow this mailing list; if you want to
get feedback on a gtk patch you should mail gtk-devel-list, and open a
bug in bugzilla:
Hi,
Bit long, sorry.
I build my own GTK+ stack with MinGW (TDM-4.6.1) and have been using 2.16 and
Glib 2.28 (with Gtk2-Perl bindings mostly) for a long time, then switched to
GTK+ 2.24 when that started to get stable enough. Wanting to start with WebKit
I switched to Glib 2.30 to be able to
On 7/3/2012 2:59 PM, Martin Schlemmer wrote:
I build my own GTK+ stack with MinGW (TDM-4.6.1) and have been using 2.16
I am not sure I could help but I got interested in the subject since I am
trying to do exactly what you are doing, build gtk stack with MinGW.
This still worked fine, but
13 matches
Mail list logo
