Brion Vibber wrote:
Tim wrote:
Regarding MDI, I still see many apps that are being developed that
don't have MDI support and they really need it. A good example is
BBEdit on Mac. I don't use this app because it's just too hard to
manage the multiple sources I have open at one time to do my codin
Tim wrote:
Regarding MDI, I still see many apps that are being developed that don't
have MDI support and they really need it. A good example is BBEdit on
Mac. I don't use this app because it's just too hard to manage the
multiple sources I have open at one time to do my coding.
You might try out
On Thu, 2004-09-09 at 07:37, Tim wrote:
> Cool! I saw that Code Tek had a hack for this but having a lower level
> hack is for sure the way to go.
>
> Regarding MDI, I still see many apps that are being developed that don't
> have MDI support and they really need it. A good example is BBEdit on
Brion Vibber wrote:
Tim wrote:
In the meantime, developers are left hanging with putting out apps
that have just way too many windows. I've used Gimp on my OSX box and
it totally sucks having to first clicking the window to get focus
before being able to click the item. If the app ran on a MDI
Tim wrote:
Firstly, I agree with all prior posts that M$ has destroyed the concept
of MDI by having the window in window approach using a window menu and
having maximized sub windows, tiled or cascaded. This type of MDI is
what another user called winMDI and I totally agree that it sucks big tim
> In the meantime, developers are left hanging with putting out apps that
> have just way too many windows. I've used Gimp on my OSX box and it
> totally sucks having to first clicking the window to get focus before
> being able to click the item. If the app ran on a MDI framework, this
> woul
On Wed, 2004-09-08 at 19:42, Brion Vibber wrote:
> Tim wrote:
> > In the meantime, developers are left hanging with putting out apps that
> > have just way too many windows. I've used Gimp on my OSX box and it
> > totally sucks having to first clicking the window to get focus before
> > being ab
Tim wrote:
In the meantime, developers are left hanging with putting out apps that
have just way too many windows. I've used Gimp on my OSX box and it
totally sucks having to first clicking the window to get focus before
being able to click the item. If the app ran on a MDI framework, this
woul
>have just way too many windows. I've used Gimp on my OSX box and it
>totally sucks having to first clicking the window to get focus before
>being able to click the item. If the app ran on a MDI framework, this
>would not be necessary.
its also not necessary if you use a window manager that doe
On Wed, 08 Sep 2004 17:43:25 -0400, Tim <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Firstly, I agree with all prior posts that M$ has destroyed the concept
> of MDI by having the window in window approach using a window menu and
> having maximized sub windows, tiled or cascaded. This type of MDI is
> what another
Firstly, I agree with all prior posts that M$ has destroyed the concept
of MDI by having the window in window approach using a window menu and
having maximized sub windows, tiled or cascaded. This type of MDI is
what another user called winMDI and I totally agree that it sucks big time.
However
11 matches
Mail list logo
