Problem when reparenting gtktrees

2000-11-24 Thread Ian King
Hi all, I have a problem with gtktree regarding reparenting. When I have a gtktree that has tree items with subtrees, if I remove the tree from its parent and then put it back, the expand/collapse pixmaps on the gtkitems completely disappear rendering the tree unusable. Is there a way around

Re: Problem when reparenting gtktrees

2000-11-24 Thread Havoc Pennington
Hi, GtkTree unfortunately doesn't work; use GtkCTree. GtkTree will be removed in the future. Havoc ___ gtk-list mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-list

Re: Problem when reparenting gtktrees

2000-11-26 Thread Florent. Devin
Havoc Pennington a écrit : > > Hi, > > GtkTree unfortunately doesn't work; use GtkCTree. GtkTree will be > removed in the future. > > Havoc > Hi, Will GtkCtree be remove in the future too ? Cause when looking in the spec of Gtk 2.0, I saw another widget to manage this type of struct ... -- Fl

Re: Problem when reparenting gtktrees

2000-11-27 Thread Havoc Pennington
"Florent. Devin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Hi, > Will GtkCtree be remove in the future too ? > Cause when looking in the spec of Gtk 2.0, I saw another widget to > manage this type of struct ... CTree will be around a lot longer than GtkTree, it likely won't be removed until no one is using

Re: Problem when reparenting gtktrees

2000-11-27 Thread Darin Fisher
> CTree will be around a lot longer than GtkTree, it likely won't be > removed until no one is using it anymore. GtkTree will be removed more > agressively since it's not just suboptimal, it's flat-out broken. > > Havoc Just to satisfy my curiosity... when you say that GtkTree is broken, do yo

Re: Problem when reparenting gtktrees

2000-11-27 Thread Havoc Pennington
Darin Fisher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Just to satisfy my curiosity... when you say that GtkTree is > broken, do you mean that the interface is broken? or that the > implementation is broken? I understand that a poor interface > can make for a poor implementation, but what I'm really > wond