Re: QT vs GTK 2006

2006-03-07 Thread Daniel Espinosa
2006/3/6, Martin Olsson [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Hi folks,I'm currently evaluating (GUI) toolkits, and I'm interested in thedifferences between QT and GTK. My code is going to be GPLed and I need itto be cross-platform. I've read a few previous threads from this list concerning this subject so I know

Re: QT vs GTK 2006

2006-03-07 Thread Matthias Clasen
On 3/6/06, Martin Olsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: Hi folks, I'm currently evaluating (GUI) toolkits, and I'm interested in the differences between QT and GTK. My code is going to be GPLed and I need it to be cross-platform. I've read a few previous threads from this list concerning this

Re: QT vs GTK 2006

2006-03-07 Thread Derek Piper
My 2 cents on the questions I have an opinion about. Martin Olsson wrote: Hi folks, I'm currently evaluating (GUI) toolkits, and I'm interested in the differences between QT and GTK. My code is going to be GPLed and I need it to be cross-platform. I've read a few previous threads from

QT vs GTK 2006

2006-03-06 Thread Martin Olsson
Hi folks, I'm currently evaluating (GUI) toolkits, and I'm interested in the differences between QT and GTK. My code is going to be GPLed and I need it to be cross-platform. I've read a few previous threads from this list concerning this subject so I know all the basic stuff, but atleast some of

Re: QT vs GTK 2006

2006-03-06 Thread Michael Ekstrand
On Mon, 6 Mar 2006 16:03:08 +0100 (CET) Martin Olsson [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1. Is the win32 version of GTK really that unstable? It's homepage still (as of today) contain a rather scary warning sign. I haven't had any problems using it (from an end-user perspective). I've used Gimp for

re: QT vs GTK 2006

2006-03-06 Thread andrew
1. Is the win32 version of GTK really that unstable? It's homepage still (as of today) contain a rather scary warning sign. It all depends on what you're trying to do. If it is a very involved application, you may run into some basic problems. The worst part is getting it installed, but that

re: QT vs GTK 2006

2006-03-06 Thread Michael L Torrie
On Mon, 2006-03-06 at 08:08 -0800, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: 1. Is the win32 version of GTK really that unstable? It's homepage still (as of today) contain a rather scary warning sign. It all depends on what you're trying to do. If it is a very involved application, you may run into some

Re: QT vs GTK 2006

2006-03-06 Thread Tor Lillqvist
Martin Olsson writes: 1. Is the win32 version of GTK really that unstable? No. If it works, it works quite well. On some machines there are problems with some 3rd-party fonts in Pango, but once you get around those, it should run fine. It's homepage still (as of today) contain a rather