Thank you for the help, guys.
Everything works as expected.
Now to check the data validity
-Original Message-
>From: Ingo Krabbe
>Sent: Mar 27, 2011 3:33 AM
>To: gtk-list@gnome.org
>Subject: Re: Timer start registration breaks the gtk_main()
>
>On Sat, Mar 26,
On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 20:27:04 -0700 (GMT-07:00)
iko...@earthlink.net wrote:
> >Yes, ReadData() is a non-static class member function. Illegal casts
> >to avoid compilation failure has, as you can tell, not saved you
> >here.
>
> So in order to fix it, I need to use 'static' in front of 'void
> Rea
replied too fast...
- Forwarded message from Ingo Krabbe -
>
> static frame_ReadData(CFrame *f) { return f->ReadData(); }
Actually and fully you will need
static gboolean frame_ReadData(CFrame* f) { return f->ReadData(); }
Note that frame_ReadData is a C function, so that static mean
Ingo,
-Original Message-
>From: Ingo Krabbe
>Sent: Mar 27, 2011 12:33 AM
>To: gtk-list@gnome.org
>Subject: Re: Timer start registration breaks the gtk_main()
>
>On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 11:48:38PM -0700, iko...@earthlink.net wrote:
>> Lex,
>>
>>
&g
On Sat, Mar 26, 2011 at 11:48:38PM -0700, iko...@earthlink.net wrote:
> Lex,
>
>
> -Original Message-
> >From: Lex Trotman
> >Sent: Mar 26, 2011 10:47 PM
> >To: iko...@earthlink.net
> >Cc: gtk-list
> >Subject: Re: Timer start registratio
Hi iko...@earthlink.net,
On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 20:45:53 -0700 (GMT-07:00) you wrote:
> >
> >Yes. You are casting the _RESULT_ of a _CALL_ to ReadData into a
> >GSourceFunc, but ReadData returns void. This produces utterly random results.
>
> Yes, I believe I made a mistake here. I was not in fron
Lex,
-Original Message-
>From: Lex Trotman
>Sent: Mar 26, 2011 10:47 PM
>To: iko...@earthlink.net
>Cc: gtk-list
>Subject: Re: Timer start registration breaks the gtk_main()
>
>>>It is not automagically passed a pointer to an instance of the object
>>>
>>It is not automagically passed a pointer to an instance of the object
>>(no "this") so it will only work if the function does not access any
>>instance members.
>
> Which means that every member of the class that will be used by this function
> should be static. But this is not good.
Not if you
Lex,
-Original Message-
>From: Lex Trotman
>Sent: Mar 26, 2011 8:41 PM
>To: iko...@earthlink.net
>Cc: gtk-list
>Subject: Re: Timer start registration breaks the gtk_main()
>
>>>ReadData() is not a good old C function, but a C++ method, carrying
>&g
Robert,
-Original Message-
>From: Robert Pearce
>Sent: Mar 26, 2011 3:14 PM
>To: iko...@earthlink.net
>Cc: gtk-list@gnome.org
>Subject: Re: Timer start registration breaks the gtk_main()
>
>Hi iko...@earthlink.net,
>
>On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 11:38:27 -0700 (
>>ReadData() is not a good old C function, but a C++ method, carrying
>>around a pointer to the CFrame instance. You should make ReadData() static
>>or use more advanced tecniques, such as libsigc++ [1].
>
> So all I need is to do:
>
> class CFrame
> {
> static void ReadData();
> }
>
> ?
>
> Th
Chris,
-Original Message-
>From: Chris Vine
>Sent: Mar 26, 2011 2:05 PM
>To: iko...@earthlink.net
>Cc: gtk-list@gnome.org
>Subject: Re: Timer start registration breaks the gtk_main()
>
>On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 11:38:27 -0700 (GMT-07:00)
>iko...@earthlink.net wrote:
Nicola,
-Original Message-
>From: Nicola Fontana
>Sent: Mar 26, 2011 1:10 PM
>To: iko...@earthlink.net
>Cc: Robert Pearce , gtk-list@gnome.org
>Subject: Re: Timer start registration breaks the gtk_main()
>
>Il giorno Sat, 26 Mar 2011 11:38:27 -0700 (GMT-07:00)
>
Tadej,
-Original Message-
>From: Tadej Borovšak
>Sent: Mar 26, 2011 12:54 PM
>To: gtk-list@gnome.org
>Subject: Re: Timer start registration breaks the gtk_main()
>
>Hello.
>
>> int main()
>> {
>> CFrame *frame = new CFrame();
>>
Hi iko...@earthlink.net,
On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 11:38:27 -0700 (GMT-07:00) you wrote:
> Hi, Robert,
>
> Here is what I do:
>
> int main()
> {
> CFrame *frame = new CFrame();
> result = frame->OpenPort();
> if( !result )
> return 1;
> else
> {
>g_t
On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 21:10:30 +0100
Nicola Fontana wrote:
> ReadData() is not a good old C function, but a C++ method, carrying
> around a pointer to the CFrame instance. You should make ReadData()
> static [ ...]
That is a less grievous error than the original code (it will work on
gcc), but a po
On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 11:38:27 -0700 (GMT-07:00)
iko...@earthlink.net wrote:
> If I comment out the call to g_timer_add_seconds() it does not crash.
>
> Here is what I do:
>
> int main()
> {
> CFrame *frame = new CFrame();
> result = frame->OpenPort();
> if( !result )
>
Il giorno Sat, 26 Mar 2011 11:38:27 -0700 (GMT-07:00)
iko...@earthlink.net ha scritto:
> Hi, Robert,
>
>
> -Original Message-
> >From: Robert Pearce
> >Sent: Mar 26, 2011 2:19 AM
> >To: gtk-list@gnome.org
> >Cc: iko...@earthlink.net
> >Subjec
Hello.
> int main()
> {
> CFrame *frame = new CFrame();
> result = frame->OpenPort();
> if( !result )
> return 1;
> else
> {
>g_timer_add_seconds( 1, (GSourceFunc) frame->ReadData(), NULL );
>gtk_widget_show( window );
>fr
Hi, Robert,
-Original Message-
>From: Robert Pearce
>Sent: Mar 26, 2011 2:19 AM
>To: gtk-list@gnome.org
>Cc: iko...@earthlink.net
>Subject: Re: Timer start registration breaks the gtk_main()
>
>Hi iko...@earthlink.net,
>
>On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 01:54:31 -0700 (
Hi iko...@earthlink.net,
On Sat, 26 Mar 2011 01:54:31 -0700 (GMT-07:00) you wrote:
> Hi, ALL,
> Is it possible for the timer to cause gtk_main() to crash?
>
It's possible for anything to become the point where your program
crashes if you are sufficiently badly abusing it. Why do you pick on
"the t
21 matches
Mail list logo
