On Sat, 6 Sep 2003 22:34:33 -0700
Ken Deeter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
- it has to be made clear to a person using a im context that they
need to override this added method. An ideal solution should not
require a creator of a widget that uses an IM context to have to
implement a separate
On Fri, 05 Sep 2003 12:13:26 +0900
Takuro Ashie [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
To determine whether the state is inputing or not, I think input
widgets should have a vertual method like get_im_context or
get_active_im_context.
If input widgets has such a method, toplevel doesn't always need to
If such change is possible, solving the bug will be easy. But I'm not
sure this is good appropirate, too...
Just to keep the discussion going, this patch is surely one way to solve
it, but i think it has some disadvantages.
- it has to be made clear to a person using a im context that
On Wed, 3 Sep 2003 20:43:35 -0700
Ken Deeter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. add active (this means while inputing) im context variable to
each toplevel window
From a application behaviour point of view (as opposed to the code's
point of view) I think we want the im to steal events only
Hi all.
I'm also considering about this problem.
I don't have complete solutions yet, but at least I agree with
Tokunaga-san's opinion mostoly.
At Fri, 5 Sep 2003 04:37:40 +0900,
TOKUNAGA Hiroyuki wrote:
I agree with you that IM want keystrokes only when inputting. So active im
context
On Tue, 02 Sep 2003 17:43:20 -0400
Owen Taylor [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I'd suggest looking at:
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90082
instead. The problem is not
widgets should get all keystrokes before accelerator processing
But:
Input methods should get keystrokes
1. add active (this means while inputing) im context variable to
each toplevel window
I'm not sure of all the details so I do apologize if I mis-assume something.
I just wanted to make sure, if this happens, then what will be the case
when say one activates an IM, but input focus go's
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003 16:58:18 -0700
Ken Deeter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been looking through bugzilla for the exact report.. but there
was(still is w/ 2.2.x) a problem where when using the XIM based
immodule, key events are recieved by the application even when an XIM
consumes those keys.
This bug has been fixed? I've tested latest CVS now, but seems this bug
isn't fixed yet.
My apologies, http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=90082 was the one I was
looking for but apparently there has been some more stuff added since I last looked.
To solve this problem, once
On Mon, 2003-09-01 at 23:10, TOKUNAGA Hiroyuki wrote:
On Mon, 1 Sep 2003 16:58:18 -0700
Ken Deeter [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I've been looking through bugzilla for the exact report.. but there
was(still is w/ 2.2.x) a problem where when using the XIM based
immodule, key events are
10 matches
Mail list logo
