Tor Lillqvist wrote:
>> If you mean by "broad" a very basic knowledge
>
> Yes, sorry. That's indeed what I meant. (Not a native speaker...)
that's ok. being married to a non-native speaker, I have learned to
guess that sort of thing.
> I don't want to sound like this would be some competition, b
> So, is it really so bad to come up with some instructions that go beyond
> this list and might even help someone in more than one list?
No, not at all. Your message was very welcome.
--tml
___
gtk-list mailing list
gtk-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome
Tor Lillqvist wrote:
> Please note than Damon's instructions, while very detailled, were
> specifically oriented towards Glade and gtkmm -using software
> developers, as far as I could see. That is one problem with this: When
> one person talks about "GTK" they actually mean using GTK from C++
> us
> Cheers for the GTK on Win32 instructions.
Was that serious or tongue-in-cheek?
Please note than Damon's instructions, while very detailled, were
specifically oriented towards Glade and gtkmm -using software
developers, as far as I could see. That is one problem with this: When
one person talks
Cheers for the GTK on Win32 instructions.
2008/5/18 Damon Register <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Gorshkov wrote:
> > John Smith wrote:
> >> On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 1:25 PM, Tor Lillqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >>> Well, it is kinda assumed that people interested in developing
> >>> GTK+-using soft
On Sunday 18 May 2008, Damon Register wrote:
> I do find that many times instructions are written for the experts
> and sometimes leave out small details that might not be so obvious
> for non-experts.
>
Instructions written by the software authors will nearly always be written for
experts. This
> If you mean by "broad" a very basic knowledge
Yes, sorry. That's indeed what I meant. (Not a native speaker...)
Reading http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/broad I guess I
meant meaning 3b or 8 but it could also be interpreted as meaning 2.
> 2. from http://gladewin32.sourceforge.net/ ge
Gorshkov wrote:
> John Smith wrote:
>> On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 1:25 PM, Tor Lillqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>> Well, it is kinda assumed that people interested in developing
>>> GTK+-using software have a broad understanding of concepts like
>>> pkg-config, make, shell commands, environment v
John Smith wrote:
> On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 1:25 PM, Tor Lillqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> Well, it is kinda assumed that people interested in developing
>> GTK+-using software have a broad understanding of concepts like
>> pkg-config, make, shell commands, environment variables PATH and
>> P
> yes, i suppose i could adopt this policy for my software tool and user
> base (seismologists).
Hmm. It seems we are talking about apples and oranges here. The
original poster, as far as I could understand, is a *programmer* and
wanted to set up a *development* environment for building GTK+-using
Ladies!
Calm down!
__
Sent from Yahoo! Mail.
A Smarter Email http://uk.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html
___
gtk-list mailing list
gtk-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-
On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 14:04 +0200, Richard Boaz wrote:
>> i've said it before (many years ago now) and i'll say it again: providing
>> a product without good documentation that will allow new users to both
>> learn how to use it and get the job done at the same time is a product
>> that has yet to
On Wed, 2008-05-14 at 14:04 +0200, Richard Boaz wrote:
> i've said it before (many years ago now) and i'll say it again: providing
> a product without good documentation that will allow new users to both
> learn how to use it and get the job done at the same time is a product
> that has yet to eve
--- Richard Boaz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> it's one of the drawbacks of open-source: no one can be held responsible
> for a bad attitude created from a position of power; not a little unlike
> the same attitude created from a position of monopoly.
>
> i've said it before (many years ago n
John Smith пишет:
> [...]
> Actually, I *am* using and IDE: I have set up MingW with Eclipse as
> the IDE on Windows. And since im obviously not an expert (yet)
[...]
So why not using gtk+ installer from
http://sourceforge.net/projects/gladewin32
?
I also use Eclipse (and now begin using Code::Blo
Well, it is kinda assumed that people interested in developing
GTK+-using software have a broad understanding of concepts like
pkg-config, make, shell commands, environment variables PATH and
PKG_CONFIG_PATH etc.
For people who really don't have a clue about stuff like that, a MinGW
and MSY
On Wed, May 14, 2008 at 1:25 PM, Tor Lillqvist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Well, it is kinda assumed that people interested in developing
> GTK+-using software have a broad understanding of concepts like
> pkg-config, make, shell commands, environment variables PATH and
> PKG_CONFIG_PATH etc.
>
> Should I just untar the whole bundle, and move it into my mingw directory ?
(I assume you mean "unzip" and not "untar", if you are talking about
the gtk+ bundles on ftp.gnome.org? And BTW, don't use "Winzip". It
tries to be too clever and can actually be dangerous. Just use the
built-in zip arch
Hi,
Im running on Windows XP, and have just setup MingW and Msys. Now ive
downloaded the 'all-in-one bundle' of the GTK+ stack, and am a bit
unsure about how to proceed with my setup. My ultimate goal is to
write and compile programs that use GTK+ on Windows. Should I just
untar the whole bundle,
19 matches
Mail list logo
