Re: bug(s) in all-in-one bundle?

2008-06-02 Thread Sergei Steshenko
--- Tor Lillqvist [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: What instructions? ;) I am afraid I must again use the term is expected that seemed to upset some people last time... The Win32 binaries for the GTK+ stack on ftp.gnome.org are expected to be used by people who develop GTK+ applications and/or

Re: bug(s) in all-in-one bundle?

2008-06-02 Thread Damon Register
Tor Lillqvist wrote: the gladewin32 package had the file C:\GTK\etc\gtk-2.0\gtkrc while the all-in-one bundle does not. I copied that one line file to the all-in-one bundle and it worked. The font problem was solved. What was the contents of the gtkrc file that solved your (perceived)

bug(s) in all-in-one bundle?

2008-06-01 Thread Damon Register
With a bit of work and a lot of help from the gtk-list and glade list, I have been able to get a working development environment in Windows using MinGW, msys, gtk bundle and building a few packages including Glade3-3.4.5. I am now able to build a simple libglademm app. The one problem I wasn't

Re: bug(s) in all-in-one bundle?

2008-06-01 Thread Tor Lillqvist
the gladewin32 package had the file C:\GTK\etc\gtk-2.0\gtkrc while the all-in-one bundle does not. I copied that one line file to the all-in-one bundle and it worked. The font problem was solved. What was the contents of the gtkrc file that solved your (perceived) problem? Is this a bug

Re: bug(s) in all-in-one bundle?

2008-06-01 Thread Richard Boaz
Shouldn't the instructions include such a thing? What instructions? ;) and we programmers wonder why we have such a poor reputation re: documentation of our work. :( ___ gtk-list mailing list gtk-list@gnome.org