compiling gdk-pixbuf in 2.0.7

2002-11-06 Thread stewartb
im getting this trying to build gtk 2.0.7 under linux when it starts building gdk-pixbuf: /usr/bin/ld:.libs/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.ver:1: parse error in VERSION script any clues? glib 2.0.7 built fine by the way... thanks, Stewart Birnam -- ILM Systems R&D -- x2089 _

Re: compiling gdk-pixbuf in 2.0.7

2002-11-07 Thread Sven Neumann
Hi, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > im getting this trying to build gtk 2.0.7 under linux when it starts building > gdk-pixbuf: > > /usr/bin/ld:.libs/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.ver:1: parse error in VERSION script > > any clues? glib 2.0.7 built fine by the way... I've heard the same complaints from some u

Re: compiling gdk-pixbuf in 2.0.7

2002-11-07 Thread Owen Taylor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > im getting this trying to build gtk 2.0.7 under linux when it starts building > gdk-pixbuf: > > /usr/bin/ld:.libs/libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.ver:1: parse error in VERSION script > > any clues? glib 2.0.7 built fine by the way... What distribution and version of linux? What v

Re: compiling gdk-pixbuf in 2.0.7

2002-11-07 Thread stewartb
> > What distribution and version of linux? What version of gcc and > binutils? Red Hat Linux release 7.2 (Enigma) Linux emmapeel.lucasdigital.com 2.4.7-10 #1 Thu Sep 6 17:27:27 EDT 2001 i686 gcc --version 2.96 binutils-2.11.90.0.8-9 > > Can you attach the libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.ver script? { global:

Re: compiling gdk-pixbuf in 2.0.7

2002-11-07 Thread stewartb
updating binutils to 2.11.93.0.2-11 seems to have fixed it. so maybe adding a dependancy to configure is in order... thanks for your help. Stewart Birnam -- ILM Systems R&D -- x2089 On Thu, 7 Nov 2002, Owen Taylor wrote: > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > im getting this trying to build

Re: compiling gdk-pixbuf in 2.0.7

2002-11-08 Thread Owen Taylor
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > > > > What distribution and version of linux? What version of gcc and > > binutils? > > Red Hat Linux release 7.2 (Enigma) > Linux emmapeel.lucasdigital.com 2.4.7-10 #1 Thu Sep 6 17:27:27 EDT 2001 i686 > gcc --version 2.96 > binutils-2.11.90.0.8-9 OK, I tracked down