On Apr 17, 2006, at 9:27 AM, Jaap Karssenberg wrote:
It seems that the problem with the copy() function is not recursize
(the copies of a copy are not the same) so this works for now.
It would help to see your code and hear your explanation of how you
know the objects are not distinct copi
On 4/15/06, Fabrizio Lanza <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Never mind, I found out:
> http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtk-perl-list/2003-September/msg00242.html
I was about to answer, but it appears that my past self had something
to say. I would not suggest using the eval from that code, it is
prob
P.S.
I forgot to name my versions:
gtk2 2.8.16
gtk2-perl 1.102
I fixed my problem now by the following work around:
I assign a key into the Pixbuf perl object $pixbuf->{_exists} = 1 then
when constructing a new one if the copy() function returns an object
with this key set I call the c
Hi,
Could it be that there is a bug in the "copy" method for the
gtk2::Gdk::Pixbug object ?
I have the following situation, I use Gtk2::Widget->render_icon to get a
"missing-image" icon. But since I want to tread each image as a separate
object I want to make a private copy of this pixbuf.
On Fri, 14 Apr 2006 16:06:15 -0400
zentara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I've made the code text code, the same as in the Gnome2::Canvas demo.
>It works when I use the plain subclassed canvas, but when I use
>aa=>1 , I get a slew of errors
>
>Pango-CRITICAL **: pango_renderer_draw_layout: assertion
