Re: Glib::[gs]et_prgname

2020-02-01 Thread Torsten Schoenfeld
On 28.01.20 19:34, Jeff via gtk-perl-list wrote: On 02/01/2020 20:31, Torsten Schönfeld wrote: If setting $0 does not achieve what you need, I see no problem in adding the bindings.  Patches welcome.  Otherwise I'll add it to my list, but I don't know when I'll be able to get to it. How about

Re: Glib::[gs]et_prgname

2020-01-28 Thread Jeff via gtk-perl-list
his? Regards Jeff From 34257e2c4e766938b6202025a08e9bb8c63b0742 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Jeffrey Ratcliffe Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2020 00:00:00 + Subject: [PATCH] + Glib::[gs]et_prgname --- GUtils.xs | 22 +++--- t/1.t | 6 +- 2 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

Re: Glib::[gs]et_prgname

2020-01-02 Thread Torsten Schönfeld
On 02.01.20 12:43, Jeff via gtk-perl-list wrote: Bitten by a problem that looks as if it requires me to Glib::set_prgname() to solve[1], I attempted to use it, only to discover that although the code is in the git repo, it is commented out[2]. Why? I don't know. Most likely, no-one saw a use

Glib::[gs]et_prgname

2020-01-02 Thread Jeff via gtk-perl-list
Bitten by a problem that looks as if it requires me to Glib::set_prgname() to solve[1], I attempted to use it, only to discover that although the code is in the git repo, it is commented out[2]. Why? How can I use Glib::set_prgname()? Regards Jeff [1]https://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2020/