Kevin Ryde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I added the words below to the manual as the last subsection in
> "Dynamic Libraries", to encourage packages to use libdir. I don't
> want to re-open the can of worms about versioning and stuff, this is
> intended just to describe the present situation.
V
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Hi,
>
> Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> But that would still bring in a start-stack and so change backtraces,
>> so I'd prefer not.
>
> Oh, right.
>
>> I really think with-fluids is the way to go. If you agree, I'll make
>> this change in
Marius Vollmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> I just put scm_is_pair into inline.h, using our existing inlining
> machinery that should be portable enough.
Maybe scm_is_eq too (picking up scm_is_true and scm_is_false at the
same time).
___
Guile-devel
Kevin Ryde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> The spec for catch's pre-unwind-handler would be that it can exit
>> either normally or non-locally. If it exits normally, Guile unwinds
>> (dynamic context + stack) and then calls the normal (post-unwind)
>> h
Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> The spec for catch's pre-unwind-handler would be that it can exit
> either normally or non-locally. If it exits normally, Guile unwinds
> (dynamic context + stack) and then calls the normal (post-unwind)
> handler. If it exits non-locally, that exit det
I added the words below to the manual as the last subsection in
"Dynamic Libraries", to encourage packages to use libdir. I don't
want to re-open the can of worms about versioning and stuff, this is
intended just to describe the present situation.
5.16.4.4 Compiled Code Installation
..
Kevin Ryde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> (What we have in the 1.8 branch is not immediately the 1.8.0 release,
>> but should be very close.)
>
> Do you really want to branch at all?
For what it's worth, I'd say there a benefit to branching as late as
possible. If there aren't any items waiting
