I started a few minimal bits of 64-bit file support: in stat, lstat,
readdir, truncate-file and copy-file.
I don't have 4G of disk to test the copy-file, but it starts running
ok. (It's not blindingly fast, maybe a bigger buffer would help.
It'd be nice if it was interruptable too, maybe SCM_TICK
"Mikael Djurfeldt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> While putting together my daugther's Easter egg, I suddenly realized
> that the thing that mght bite you is that many parts of GOOPS is
> written in Scheme so that, if this UNBOUND value is eqv? to
> SCM_UNDEFINED, things go wrong as soon as any Sch
On 4/16/06, Mikael Djurfeldt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 4/16/06, Mikael Djurfeldt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > (define x (if #f #f))
> > (slot-set! quux 'bar x)
>
> Actually, I notice that I read your post sloppily. SCM_UNDEFINED
> might work, but I think you should check that thoroughly.
On 4/16/06, Mikael Djurfeldt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> (define x (if #f #f))
> (slot-set! quux 'bar x)
Actually, I notice that I read your post sloppily. SCM_UNDEFINED
might work, but I think you should check that thoroughly.
___
Guile-devel mailin
On 4/15/06, Clinton Ebadi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> guile> (use-modules (oop goops))
> guile> (define-class () (bar))
> guile> (define quux (make ))
> guile> (slot-ref quux 'bar)
>
> Backtrace:
> In current input:
>5: 0* [slot-ref #< a7cd00f0> bar]
>
> :5:1: In procedure slot-ref in express
When I was running through the evaluator code, I noticed the comment on
SCM_UNBOUND (only used by GOOPS), and that it should be replaced by
SCM_UNSPECIFIED.
Defining SCM_GOOPS_UNBOUND to SCM_UNDEFINED seemed to work:
guile> (version)
"1.9.0"
guile> (use-modules (oop goops))
guile> (define-class
Someone, please correct me if I am wrong, but I think GCC-4 is
still too green for industrial use. Have you a GCC-3.x handy?
Reg Clemens wrote:
Hi Harlan, Reg, NTP developers (via relay) & Guile developers:
This is a problem. I (almost) only ever use pre-built Guile
packages and let others st
Hi Harlan, Reg, NTP developers (via relay) & Guile developers:
This is a problem. I (almost) only ever use pre-built Guile
packages and let others struggle with the porting issue.
Occasionally, I do build it just to verify that current
versions haven't wiggled too much for AutoGen to operate,
bu
> But I don't quite follow why a remember would be wanted in
> SCM_VALIDATE_CELL. I'd have thought it was in fact a good thing if
> the "cell" value went dead if not being checked.
Hunh!? This whole thread is about building guile in gcc 4.n on a
64-bit machine. It doesn't build, or run unless
