Hi,
On Sat, 2007-05-26 at 16:45 +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> I committed the patch below to HEAD.
Great!
> For 1.8, I'm pretty much inclined to commit a similar patch, i.e., where
> `module-make-local-var!' and `scm_m_define' are copied from HEAD. This
> would break code that does things lik
Hi,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Actually, no: the test does a `define' _within_ the body of `begin', so
> I *think* this qualifies as an internal define, and internal defines are
> equivalent to `letrec' (Section 5.2.2).
I was wrong: `define' within `begin' does not qualify as
Hi Andy!
Andy Wingo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 20:12 +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
>> Alas, it breaks the following test in `syntax.test':
>
> I'm not sure what "it" is in this case; I assume you mean the fix to
> module-make-local-var!.
"It" means "the reordering of `ev
Replying to myself,
On Sat, 2007-05-26 at 12:49 +0200, Andy Wingo wrote:
> On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 20:12 +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> > (pass-if "binding is created before expression is evaluated"
> > (= (eval '(begin
> > (define foo
> > (begin
> >
Hey Ludovic,
Thanks for looking at this!
On Fri, 2007-05-25 at 20:12 +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> Alas, it breaks the following test in `syntax.test':
I'm not sure what "it" is in this case; I assume you mean the fix to
module-make-local-var!.
> (pass-if "binding is created before expressi
