Han-Wen Nienhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
Ludovic Courtès escreveu:
I'm still in favor of git revert since the log message makes it clear
which patch was reverted and why. We can then take our time and work
out a proper fix, and finally re-merge the patch plus its fix.
Furthermore, in the
Han-Wen Nienhuys escreveu:
The use of scm_gc_mark() outside of GC is fundamentally broken, since it
creates race conditions in the presence of threads.
I was not aware that this was the case.
My impression was that the mark phase is global; it requires all threads
that were in guile mode to
Hello,
Thanks for the nice summary!
Andy Wingo [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
But what if it goes like this:
S becomes collectable in theory
mark phase: S is indeed marked as collectable
C is returned from a callback: get_ptr() return S
at some later time the card containing S is
Reasons:
* Much more detailed and inherently correct information can be gotten from
git log -- libguile/
git log -- test-suite/
etc.
* The ChangeLog duplicates the git log information if done correctly. Hence
it requires double work for the committer.
* Since updates to the
Han-Wen Nienhuys [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Reasons:
* Much more detailed and inherently correct information can be gotten from
git log -- libguile/
git log -- test-suite/
etc.
* The ChangeLog duplicates the git log information if done correctly. Hence
it requires
