Hi Neil,
On Tue 28 Oct 2008 00:51, "Neil Jerram" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> It's not rocket science, and you probably guessed at that solution
> already - but I think it really is the _right_ fix, because
>
> - the principle of the elisp integration is that there is a new value
> #nil, which a
Hello,
Your friendly neighborhood (oop goops) has been nationalized and
reclaimed by a group calling itself the "People's Compilation Front"
(PCF). I found the following note scrawled on the back of a page of
R6RS, and wished to communicate it to the wider Guile community. I've
added some comments
Hi,
Andy Wingo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> I do not think the interpreter / subr division is appropriate for a
> multilingual system. To me, the division should be:
>
> * The evaluator / interpreter, that deals in Scheme;
> * A layered compiler, with different top-level layers for e.g. Guile,
On Fri 31 Oct 2008 18:54, Andy Wingo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Granted, we have ideals, and we have tradeoffs, and writing an elisp
> compiler. (Then again, maybe not that bad.) If I have to add what I
Meant to say here: "writing an elisp compiler might be a bit of work"
> consider to be a h
