Hi Julian,
Julian Graham writes:
> * I'm pleased to report that both the balloons example and the
> quotient+remainder macro example are working, which I'm going to take
> as more or less a vindication of the module environment-based implicit
> phasing approach I've been using. (I didn't quite
Hi-
In Guile, there are remnants of code that refer to the EBCDIC
character set. Has Guile ever been tested on an EBCDIC machine?
I presume that the only such surviving system would be some sort of
z/OS.
The context of the question is my attempt to make a version of Guile
that uses Unicode as
Hello!
Andy Wingo writes:
> So I was thinking: why do we have this fetish for prohibiting certain
> forms in a non-toplevel context? I am of a mind to replace eval-case
> with eval-when, which is actually more expressive, as it allows us to
> discriminate the different phases in non-toplevel con
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Hello,
>
> Andy Wingo writes:
>
>> The compiler is almost to the point that it can replace the interpreter,
>> semantically. What is needed is to read and compile toplevel definitions
>> one at a time, so we can e.g. change the reader, or the other dynamic
Hi Ludovic,
> But dot files are traditionally "hidden" on Unices. Why not go with
> `foo/bar/6/baz.scm'?
Because my initial plan was to make it possible to have R6RS libraries
coexist with Guile modules, using the same directory layout and load
system -- and, as per our earlier discussion, numbe
Neil Jerram writes:
> - first to address problems reported by helgrind (since I think we
> should take advantage of external tools before adding debug code to
> Guile internally)
Here's another lock ordering fix. (For 1.8.x at least, I haven't
checked if it's relevant to master yet.)
1.8.x
2009/3/4 Neil Jerram :
> Here's another lock ordering fix. (For 1.8.x at least, I haven't
> checked if it's relevant to master yet.)
I skimmed it quickly, looks reasonable, except for this:
else
- SCM_OUT_OF_RANGE (2, handler);
+ {
+ SCM_CRITICAL_SECTION_END;
+
