l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Andy Wingo writes:
>
>> I don't care :) I thought I recalled that Neil wanted something else,
>> and Bruno had this in the gnulib docs, so I just used that. Please tell
>> me to change it if you want it changed :-)
>
> Let's see what others think. :-)
X_
Julian Graham writes:
> Hi Guilers,
>
> While looking over the prerequisites for the proposed SRFI-100, I came
> across SRFI-98, which seemed like pretty easy win for Guile. So I did
> a quick implementation on the subway -- find it attached. I'll write
> up unit tests and docs if people think
Andy Wingo writes:
> My proposal would be a time-based release schedule. We can decide the
> Guile 2.0 release date now, and three or four micro releases before
> then.
>
> August in Europe is rather slow, and September people are catching up,
> so I would propose October 15 for Guile 2.0. Then
Andy Wingo writes:
> (I tried distcheck today at work, and it worked fine.)
That's curious. It's failing at the moment for me (as I mentioned in
another email). I guess my action to look into that failure then.
Neil
Hi all,
Neil Jerram wrote:
2009/5/27 Neil Jerram :
I also had a response from Jim Meyering, about using git reflog to
find and reconstruct an accidentally deleted head. I haven't fully
understood that yet, but in any case I'm sure now that my worry was
unfounded. So let's go ahead with write
