I've tried this, but I still get the error. Currently my files are in
every long list of files (.c, .doc, .x, and .h), and I don't see any
other places where source files for the main Guile program are listed.
Is there anything else I can try?
Thanks a lot
Noah
On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 5:39 PM,
Hi
git is offline version control. so if you committed in local several times,
when you git push. it will push all of your committed to server.
hopt this can help.
On 06/15/2010 07:36 PM, Thien-Thi Nguyen wrote:
I just did my first push to the savannah repo, and it did not go as i
expected:
() Xiangfu Liu xiangf...@gmail.com
() Tue, 15 Jun 2010 22:41:35 +0800
git is offline version control.
so if you committed in local several times,
when you git push. it will push all of your committed to server.
hopt this can help.
Thanks. I think i should have done a git rebase
Hello,
Thien-Thi Nguyen t...@gnuvola.org writes:
I just did my first push to the savannah repo, and it did not go as i
expected: the web interface shows three commits instead of one.
These are “merge commits”. Please avoid pushing any merge commits as
they make the history non-linear for no
() l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
() Tue, 15 Jun 2010 20:56:19 +0200
These are “merge commits”. Please avoid pushing any merge commits as
they make the history non-linear for no reason in such situations.
See ‘git rebase’ and the like for how to avoid it.
OK.
Besides, did you mean
Hello,
From R6RS Section 10:
define-syntax form The expander expands and evaluates the
right-hand-side expression and binds the keyword to the resulting
transformer.
Thus I think the following should work:
(define-syntax +
(let ((plus +)) ;; `+' should resolve to whatever `+'
Hi,
Thien-Thi Nguyen t...@gnuvola.org writes:
Yes, but now i believe that that was fuzzy thinking, not to mention
in disregard of my agreement to not do so made several months ago
(which i didn't remember until just after pressing RET -- sigh). :-(
Heh, no problem. ;-)
I will push only
On Tue 15 Jun 2010 16:06, Noah Lavine noah.b.lav...@gmail.com writes:
I've tried this, but I still get the error. Currently my files are in
every long list of files (.c, .doc, .x, and .h), and I don't see any
other places where source files for the main Guile program are listed.
Is there
Greets,
On Tue 15 Jun 2010 21:39, Thien-Thi Nguyen t...@gnuvola.org writes:
() l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès)
() Tue, 15 Jun 2010 20:56:19 +0200
Besides, did you mean to push to ‘master’?
Yes, but now i believe that that was fuzzy thinking, not to mention
in disregard of my agreement
Hi,
On Tue 15 Jun 2010 22:48, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
From R6RS Section 10:
define-syntax form The expander expands and evaluates the
right-hand-side expression and binds the keyword to the resulting
transformer.
Thus I think the following should work:
An
() Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com
() Tue, 15 Jun 2010 23:07:47 +0200
Just for readability I have rebased the commits. The gnulib commit will
get overwritten at the next gnulib import. GUILE_CONFIG_SCRIPT is fine.
OK, thanks for cleaning up my mess.
It's good to have tmpfile, but I wonder
Hello!
Here’s an experiment to implement constant folding using plain macros
(while waiting for an implementation of Wadell’s inlining algorithm ;-)):
--8---cut here---start-8---
(use-modules (srfi srfi-1))
(define-syntax define-nary-constructor
(lambda (s)
() Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com
() Wed, 16 Jun 2010 00:15:47 +0200
Can you give a use case for when you
want to know if a port is a tmpfile?
Off the top of my head, nothing serious, only for general debugging
control freakery. I think the last time i used it was when a child
process (of
13 matches
Mail list logo
