Re: Sputnik test result (was Re: ECMAScript support broken?)

2011-01-11 Thread Noah Lavine
Hello, The attached patch should add support for ECMAScript unicode literals. Noah On Tue, Jan 4, 2011 at 4:23 AM, Kan-Ru Chen ka...@kanru.info wrote: Hi, Noah Lavine noah.b.lav...@gmail.com writes: If you mean give guile a '.js' file have it interpret that with ecmascript, then I think

Re: Sputnik test result (was Re: ECMAScript support broken?)

2011-01-11 Thread Noah Lavine
And this fixes an error that came because Unicode 00A0 (no-break space) is supposed to be considered whitespace in ECMAScript. Noah On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 5:33 PM, Noah Lavine noah.b.lav...@gmail.com wrote: This patch fixes a lot of the unexpected token: rbrace errors that had been messing up

Re: Sputnik test result (was Re: ECMAScript support broken?)

2011-01-11 Thread Noah Lavine
And this fixes hexadecimal constants. Guile now parses all Sputnik tests for numeric literals. Noah On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Noah Lavine noah.b.lav...@gmail.com wrote: This parses decimal numbers with leading zeros correctly. Noah On Tue, Jan 11, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Noah Lavine