Re: Sputnik test result (was Re: ECMAScript support broken?)

Hi, Thanks for looking into this! Noah Lavine writes: > The attached patch should add support for ECMAScript unicode literals. I applied this one, along with corresponding test cases. Can you please resubmit the remaining patches with test case(s) for each, and each in a thread of its own? T

Re: PEG Parser

Hi! Thanks for looking into this! Perhaps Andy has some insight to share, too? Noah Lavine writes: > First of all, it passes its test suite. This is pretty good, because > its test suite includes a grammar for itself, a grammar for basic > mathematical equations, and a grammar for parsing /etc

Re: rfi: hash set

Hi Noah! Noah Lavine writes: > I started looking into implementing this, and I ran into something > strange that I'd like clarification on. Am I correct in saying that > currently, hash tables can only shrink by one size index when they are > rehashed? Yes, your analysis looks correct to me. W

Re: Guile news for the GNU Status Report

Hi Neil, Thanks for your feedback. Neil Jerram writes: >> Guile 2.0 is a breakthrough in Guile's history. First and foremost, it >> is based on a compiler and a virtual machine. The compiler compiles >> Scheme code to bytecode, applying well-known optimizations. As a >> result, Scheme code r