Oh yes, good idea. I didn't realize I had hit reply instead of reply-all. I'm replying to the list now so at least it will get a copy of the emails. :-)
On Tue, Sep 6, 2011 at 4:41 AM, Andy Wingo <wi...@pobox.com> wrote: > Hi Noah, > > Let's try to keep the list in the loop on future mails. My inbox is a > bit lossy :) > > Cheers, > > Andy > > On Tue 06 Sep 2011 04:25, Noah Lavine <noah.b.lav...@gmail.com> writes: > >> I have fixed this. There is currently a branch on Savannah called >> "wip-peg-fixed" which has all of the peg changes rebased on top of >> stable-2.0. It builds fine on my machine and runs the peg test suite >> with all passes. (I couldn't overwrite wip-peg without pulling and >> merging, and I was afraid I would mess up my changes, so I used a >> different name.) >> >> When I was trying to fix the compilation bug, I realized that for some >> reason wip-peg did not have the most recent version of the peg code. I >> don't know why that would happen, so I decided the safest thing to do >> was take my local branch of up-to-date peg code and rebase on top of >> stable-2.0, which is what I did. It now works. >> >> The next step, I think, is fixing the S-expression representation of >> some parts of the grammar. Then, finally, I think it might be ready to >> use. :-) >> >> Noah >> >> On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 10:50 AM, Noah Lavine <noah.b.lav...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> No, that eliminates the problem. >>> >>> There's still a bug in compiling the peg code, but I have a fix for >>> that too. Currently there is something odd going on with the peg test >>> suite, which I will look at, and then we can finally fix the >>> S-expression representation of the PEG grammars :-). >>> >>> Noah >>> >>> On Sun, Sep 4, 2011 at 6:14 AM, Andy Wingo <wi...@pobox.com> wrote: >>>> On Sat 03 Sep 2011 22:38, Noah Lavine <noah.b.lav...@gmail.com> writes: >>>> >>>>> It's been a while, but I just got the wip-peg branch from the main >>>>> repository and tried to build it. After doing "make clean && make", I >>>>> get this error: >>>>> >>>>> Undefined symbols: >>>>> "_rpl_open", referenced from: >>>>> _scm_open_file in libguile_2.0_la-fports.o >>>>> _scm_load_objcode in libguile_2.0_la-objcodes.o >>>>> _scm_copy_file in filesys.o >>>>> _scm_copy_file in filesys.o >>>>> _scm_open_fdes in filesys.o >>>>> ld: symbol(s) not found >>>>> >>>>> However, I do not get an error when I build the master branch. Since >>>>> wip-peg is based on the stable branch, I assume that some build change >>>>> between stable and master made it work on my system. Can anyone >>>>> suggest what that might be? >>>> >>>> wip-peg is based on stable-2.0, not master. Perhaps it was something >>>> fixed later in stable-2.0. Does the problem persist if you "git merge >>>> origin/stable-2.0"? If not, then we should probably rebase the branch >>>> again. >>>> >>>> It will be great when we finally merge this branch :-) >>>> >>>> Andy >>>> -- >>>> http://wingolog.org/ >>>> >>> > > -- > http://wingolog.org/ >