Noah Lavine noah.b.lav...@gmail.com writes:
Hello all,
Could anyone tell me the status of the ELisp implementation since July
21st (the last update)?
I'm especially interested now because of a thread on emacs-devel -
Hi-
Would it be okay for me to add scm_is_exact and scm_is_inexact
C functions as companions to the existing scm_exact_p and
scm_inexact_p?
If so, which branch?
-Mike
That makes sense. I was hoping we could skip the phase where we have
two lisp interpreters around, if Guile's ELisp implementation was good
enough, but maybe that will not be possible. Emacs already does
something similar to this for the programming language modes, where it
has another interpreter
Hi Mike,
Mike Gran spk...@yahoo.com skribis:
Would it be okay for me to add scm_is_exact and scm_is_inexact
C functions as companions to the existing scm_exact_p and
scm_inexact_p?
Yes.
If so, which branch?
2.0 is OK.
Thanks, and thanks for the doc patch you committed too!
Ludo’.
