Re: [PATCH] Add "scandir" procedure

2011-12-19 Thread Nala Ginrut
Oh, I forget to tell that C wrapper version doesn't have locale problem. And according to the commit log, seems we may expect it completely fixed in 2.0.4? On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 11:23 AM, Nala Ginrut wrote: > > > On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 5:38 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > >> Hi Nala! >> >> Than

Re: [PATCH] Add "scandir" procedure

2011-12-19 Thread Nala Ginrut
On Tue, Dec 20, 2011 at 5:38 AM, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Hi Nala! > > Thanks for testing! > > Nala Ginrut skribis: > > > 1. I think file-system-fold based scandir tried to traverse the whole > > directories include sub-directories. It's rather slow for a deep one if I > > just > > want a fi

Re: Minimal Guile

2011-12-19 Thread Noah Lavine
This is an interesting point. I was thinking about it though, and I think there is another thing that is causing a lot of this "bloat": all of the Scheme modules we are adding. There is a tension here, because having lots of modules is very important for using Guile as a language to write program

Re: [PATCH] Add "scandir" procedure

2011-12-19 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi Nala! Thanks for testing! Nala Ginrut skribis: > 1. I think file-system-fold based scandir tried to traverse the whole > directories include sub-directories. It's rather slow for a deep one if I > just > want a files list under 0 level directory tree; The code had initially approximatel

Minimal Guile

2011-12-19 Thread Mike Gran
Hi- I've been keeping up with some of the discussion on other gnu lists. One of the criticisms at the moment is that Guile is   1. bloated 2. hard to distribute.   Re point 2: hard to distribute.   A while ago I was looking at the idea of minimizing the number of files needed to ship Guile as a d

Re: [PATCH] Add "scandir" procedure

2011-12-19 Thread Nala Ginrut
hi Ludo, nice job! And I tested it, it works. But I did find some problems. Now there're three: 1. I think file-system-fold based scandir tried to traverse the whole directories include sub-directories. It's rather slow for a deep one if I just want a files list under 0 level directory tree; 2.

Re: summary: lilypond, lambda, and local-eval

2011-12-19 Thread Mark H Weaver
Andy Wingo writes: > Are you certain that it is desirable to transform it into standard > Scheme code? > > The statement that the-environment acts "as if it were the expression, > (case-lambda )" doesn't mean that you have to implement it that > way. Yes of course, but nonetheless it was temp