l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> David Kastrup skribis:
>
>> Shouldn't strings be in "internal encoding" anyway? The whole point of
>> a string is to be an array of characters. Not an array of arbitrarily
>> encoded bytes.
>
> Yes, but I was referring to “string ports”, which may actuall
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Hi,
>
> David Kastrup skribis:
>
>> Shouldn't strings be in "internal encoding" anyway? The whole point of
>> a string is to be an array of characters. Not an array of arbitrarily
>> encoded bytes.
>
> Yes, but I was referring to “string ports”, which ma
Hi,
David Kastrup skribis:
> Shouldn't strings be in "internal encoding" anyway? The whole point of
> a string is to be an array of characters. Not an array of arbitrarily
> encoded bytes.
Yes, but I was referring to “string ports”, which may actually be fed
arbitrary binary data, not just ch
