Hi Thien-Thi!
Thien-Thi Nguyen t...@gnuvola.org skribis:
Looking to move WIKID[0] out of the Guile 1.4.x ghetto (which is pretty
cozy, i must say),
(Speaking of which, do let me know when rpx has left the ghetto, too. :-))
i ran into a Guile 1.8 problem. Apparently, ‘send’ gratuitously
From: Ludovic Courtès l...@gnu.org
I imagine if this particular fix goes smoothly, i will be motivated to
continue w/ this kind of maintenance work, where the focus is on
continuity and stability (perhaps likewise showing 1.6 and 1.4 some
love, as well).
Hmm, I’d find it more
Any objections if I apply these patches soon? I'd like to get them off
of my to do list.
Thanks,
Noah
On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 1:59 PM, Noah Lavine noah.b.lav...@gmail.com wrote:
And here is a patch to remove all of the @twerp* comments. But did you
mean that I should remove them in the same
Hi guilers,
In my zeal to get more packages up on my guildhall repo, I packaged the
portable r6rs srfi collection[0]. However, this particular package runs
into some trouble when it is installed.
The issue is, the portable srfi collection uses srfi 97 names[1], for
libraries along with a common
Hello all,
As some of you are aware, I am in the process of packaging pieces of
software for a repository to be used with the guildhall package
manager for guile 2[0].
This is just a quick update on the progress of that, and a small
enticement to try to convince you to test it out[1]. Remember