Re: 1.8 ‘send’ bug + re-engagement

2012-08-25 Thread Ludovic Courtès
Hi Thien-Thi! Thien-Thi Nguyen t...@gnuvola.org skribis: Looking to move WIKID[0] out of the Guile 1.4.x ghetto (which is pretty cozy, i must say), (Speaking of which, do let me know when rpx has left the ghetto, too. :-)) i ran into a Guile 1.8 problem. Apparently, ‘send’ gratuitously

Re: 1.8 ‘send’ bug + re-engagement

2012-08-25 Thread Mike Gran
From: Ludovic Courtès l...@gnu.org I imagine if this particular fix goes smoothly, i will be motivated to continue w/ this kind of maintenance work, where the focus is on continuity and stability (perhaps likewise showing 1.6 and 1.4 some love, as well). Hmm, I’d find it more

Re: Do you recognize these modules?

2012-08-25 Thread Noah Lavine
Any objections if I apply these patches soon? I'd like to get them off of my to do list. Thanks, Noah On Wed, Jul 11, 2012 at 1:59 PM, Noah Lavine noah.b.lav...@gmail.com wrote: And here is a patch to remove all of the @twerp* comments. But did you mean that I should remove them in the same

Derick's SRFI collection guile

2012-08-25 Thread Ian Price
Hi guilers, In my zeal to get more packages up on my guildhall repo, I packaged the portable r6rs srfi collection[0]. However, this particular package runs into some trouble when it is installed. The issue is, the portable srfi collection uses srfi 97 names[1], for libraries along with a common

guildhall packages

2012-08-25 Thread Ian Price
Hello all, As some of you are aware, I am in the process of packaging pieces of software for a repository to be used with the guildhall package manager for guile 2[0]. This is just a quick update on the progress of that, and a small enticement to try to convince you to test it out[1]. Remember