Here's an improved version the patch that gracefully handles the case
where creation of the worker pool is unsuccessful due to an exception or
cancelled thread.
What do you think?
Mark
From b0d936a348b916e73e9071abeb7baae3d7c126d3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mark H Weaver m...@netris.org
On 7 November 2012 21:46, Mark H Weaver m...@netris.org wrote:
Here's an improved version the patch that gracefully handles the case
where creation of the worker pool is unsuccessful due to an exception or
cancelled thread.
What do you think?
Looks clean. Nice work picking up on this race
Hello all,
Apologies for the long delay on this, but I've finally produced an
improved implementation of functional record setters for stable-2.0.
It is fully compatible with the earlier API proposed by Ludovic in
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guile-devel/2012-04/msg00032.html
(i.e.
Previously, `get-string-n!' from `(rnrs io ports)' would not throw the
exception required by R6RS, and could not easily do so due to being
implemented entirely in C.
This change fixes this by introducing a corresponding internal C
function reporting errors by return value and reimplementing the
On Thu, Nov 8, 2012 at 5:28 AM, Ludovic Courtès l...@gnu.org wrote:
Hi!
Mark H Weaver m...@netris.org skribis:
One option would be to return to Aubrey Jaffer's model (used in SCM),
where a catalog of modules and their locations is maintained
Hmm, I never really liked that. And it’s quite
Hello all,
I've attached a slightly improved functional record setters patch.
The only change since yesterday's version is to the test suite, which
now includes tests of the compile-time error checking.
Here's a brief overview of the provided functionality.
First, 'define-immutable-record-type'
