Mark H Weaver m...@netris.org skribis:
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
Mark H Weaver m...@netris.org skribis:
+ ;; setting 'create-workers!' to a no-op is an optimization, but it is
+ ;; still possible for '%create-workers!' to be called more than once
+ ;; from different
Hello,
As Mark suggested on IRC, here’s a patch that moves SRFI-9 under
“Compound Data Types”, plus a new section “Record Overview” that aims to
guide users through the maze of record APIs.
Initially, I wanted to add a “Records Structures” section, and move
SRFI-9, Guile records, and Guile
Hello!
Documentation attached. Comments?
BTW, why does ‘set-field’ has the record as its 2nd argument instead of
1st (unlike ‘set-fields’)?
Thanks,
Ludo’.
From f7877d47009dc85e74bc63fd562b77f552a54bd6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: =?UTF-8?q?Ludovic=20Court=C3=A8s?= l...@gnu.org
Date: Sat, 10
Hi Mark,
Mark H Weaver m...@netris.org skribis:
I'd like to import your CK macro into Guile. Would you be willing to
contribute it to Guile? If so, please respond to the list to say so.
It's small enough (15 lines) that I guess we don't need papers.
For the record, there’s usually no
Hi Ludovic,
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
Documentation attached. Comments?
Thanks! Looks good to me, modulo a few comments below.
BTW, why does ‘set-field’ has the record as its 2nd argument instead of
1st (unlike ‘set-fields’)?
Good question. I followed the syntax of
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
Mark H Weaver m...@netris.org skribis:
I'd like to import your CK macro into Guile. Would you be willing to
contribute it to Guile? If so, please respond to the list to say so.
It's small enough (15 lines) that I guess we don't need papers.
For the
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
As Mark suggested on IRC, here’s a patch that moves SRFI-9 under
“Compound Data Types”, plus a new section “Record Overview” that aims to
guide users through the maze of record APIs.
Wow, thanks for doing this!
Looks great, please push :)
Mark
Mark H Weaver m...@netris.org skribis:
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
As Mark suggested on IRC, here’s a patch that moves SRFI-9 under
“Compound Data Types”, plus a new section “Record Overview” that aims to
guide users through the maze of record APIs.
Wow, thanks for doing this!
Mark H Weaver m...@netris.org skribis:
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
[...]
BTW, why does ‘set-field’ has the record as its 2nd argument instead of
1st (unlike ‘set-fields’)?
Good question. I followed the syntax of 'set-field' from your original
patch, but that argument order did
I would like to continue the discussion about native code.
Some facts are,
For example, consider this
(define (f x) (let loop ((s 0) (i 0)) (if (eq? i x) s (loop (+ s i) (+ i
1)
The timings for (f 1) ~ (f 100M) is
1) current vm : 2.93s
2) rtl
Hello,
I assume compressed native is the idea you wrote about in your last
email, where we generate native code which is a sequence of function calls
to VM operations.
I really like that idea. As you said, it uses the instruction cache better.
But it also fixes something I was worried about,
Hello!
I'd like to import your CK macro into Guile. Would you be willing to
contribute it to Guile?
Yes, certainly. I'm glad you found it helpful.
Cheers,
Oleg
The patch looks fine to me (it had better be, since it is already pushed
:P), however I wonder if it wouldn't be prudent to look to moving
define-record-type into guile proper, and making (use-modules (srfi
srfi-9)) effectively a no-op.
--
Ian Price -- shift-reset.com
Programming is like
SRFI-9 seems to be part of R7RS anyway (assuming there are no sudden
last-minute changes), so I'd say we'll definitely want to do something like
that soon.
Noah
On Sat, Nov 10, 2012 at 10:30 PM, Ian Price ianpric...@googlemail.comwrote:
The patch looks fine to me (it had better be, since it
Hi Andreas,
Thanks for the patch. See below for my comments.
Andreas Rottmann a.rottm...@gmx.at writes:
Previously, `get-string-n!' from `(rnrs io ports)' would not throw the
exception required by R6RS, and could not easily do so due to being
implemented entirely in C.
This change fixes
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Rottmann a.rottm...@gmx.at writes:
Ian Price ianpric...@googlemail.com writes:
Hi guilers,
On the #guile IRC channel, Mark Weaver has stressed to me that he thinks
it would be a good idea for us to be able to add paths to the end of the
load path, since it would allow
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
Mark H Weaver m...@netris.org skribis:
One problem I have with the existing API has to do with its treatment of
square brackets. There are multiple things that one might want to do
with square brackets, but since 'square-brackets' is a boolean option,
17 matches
Mail list logo
