Re: Core dump when throwing an exception from a resumed partial continuation

On 03/15/13 23:30, Andy Wingo wrote: On Fri 15 Mar 2013 22:01, Brent Pinkney writes: I am using partial continuations to resume a computation when an external system returns with an answer. I am using (call-with-prompt ...) and (abort-to-prompt) When I resume the continuation in another threa

Re: [PATCH] SRFI-45: Support multiple values; add promise? predicate

Mark H Weaver skribis: > From 1225cc23b9088e8d52a99f1bac2814b0905826ee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > From: Mark H Weaver > Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 20:01:12 -0400 > Subject: [PATCH] SRFI-45: Support multiple values; add promise? predicate. > > * module/srfi/srfi-45.scm (eager): Accept any number of a

Re: [PATCH] SRFI-45: Support multiple values; add promise? predicate

Hi Ludovic, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Mark H Weaver skribis: > >> From 1225cc23b9088e8d52a99f1bac2814b0905826ee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Mark H Weaver >> Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 20:01:12 -0400 >> Subject: [PATCH] SRFI-45: Support multiple values; add promise? predicate. >

Re: [PATCH] SRFI-45: Support delayed expressions that return multiple values

Hi Ian, Ian Price writes: > Mark H Weaver writes: > >> Any objections to pushing this to stable-2.0? > > Change is simple enough, and it matches the behaviour of built-in > force/delay. Should be a rubber stamp IMO :) Agreed :) > I note Eli Barzilay contributed some changes in the post-finali

Special variables to relax boxing

Hi, I wouldl like to start a discussion of introducing a way to mark variables as special, and by that mean that set! variables does not nessesary get boxed. This is a deviation from the scheme standard but it's pretty useful if one want to set! local variables but make sure that the state of the