On 03/15/13 23:30, Andy Wingo wrote:
On Fri 15 Mar 2013 22:01, Brent Pinkney writes:
I am using partial continuations to resume a computation when an
external system returns with an answer.
I am using (call-with-prompt ...) and (abort-to-prompt)
When I resume the continuation in another threa
Mark H Weaver skribis:
> From 1225cc23b9088e8d52a99f1bac2814b0905826ee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Mark H Weaver
> Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 20:01:12 -0400
> Subject: [PATCH] SRFI-45: Support multiple values; add promise? predicate.
>
> * module/srfi/srfi-45.scm (eager): Accept any number of a
Hi Ludovic,
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Mark H Weaver skribis:
>
>> From 1225cc23b9088e8d52a99f1bac2814b0905826ee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Mark H Weaver
>> Date: Mon, 18 Mar 2013 20:01:12 -0400
>> Subject: [PATCH] SRFI-45: Support multiple values; add promise? predicate.
>
Hi Ian,
Ian Price writes:
> Mark H Weaver writes:
>
>> Any objections to pushing this to stable-2.0?
>
> Change is simple enough, and it matches the behaviour of built-in
> force/delay. Should be a rubber stamp IMO :)
Agreed :)
> I note Eli Barzilay contributed some changes in the post-finali
Hi,
I wouldl like to start a discussion of introducing a way to mark
variables as special, and by that mean that set! variables does not
nessesary get boxed. This is a deviation from the scheme standard but
it's pretty useful if one want to set! local variables but make sure
that the state of the