Andy Wingo writes:
> On Fri 13 Sep 2013 21:41, Mark H Weaver writes:
>
>> Here's an implementation that does this benchmark about 80 times faster
>> on my machine: (20 milliseconds vs 1.69 seconds)
>>
>> (define* (string-replace-substring s substr replacement
>>
On Fri 20 Sep 2013 03:01, Nathaniel Alderson writes:
> Attached is a patch for srfi-18 thread-sleep! to work for timeoutes less
> than an second in the future.
Applied, finally. Thanks! Next time mail bug-gu...@gnu.org so that it
gets a ticket number and we'll be sure not to forget.
Cheers,
On Fri 13 Sep 2013 21:41, Mark H Weaver writes:
> Here's an implementation that does this benchmark about 80 times faster
> on my machine: (20 milliseconds vs 1.69 seconds)
>
> (define* (string-replace-substring s substr replacement
>#:optional
>
On Thu 15 Aug 2013 15:47, Chaos Eternal writes:
> Hence, it is reasonable to expect a way to serialize the closures to
> disks and/or remote machines over network.
Agreed. Guile 2.2's compiler might be able to do this, with some
modification -- take a closure and tree-shake out its dependencies
On Sun, Mar 23, 2014 at 12:38 PM, Andy Wingo wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Following up after a lng time --
>
> On Fri 12 Apr 2013 01:55, Daniel Hartwig writes:
>
>> On 11 April 2013 13:37, Ian Price wrote:
>>>
So, what do you think [about ,run and ,!]?
>>>
>>> This is the sort of thing that belongs
On Sun 23 Jun 2013 23:25, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> We have this (since 2010):
>
> # define SCM_SYSCALL(line)\
> do\
> { \
> errno = 0;
Hi,
Following up after a lng time --
On Fri 12 Apr 2013 01:55, Daniel Hartwig writes:
> On 11 April 2013 13:37, Ian Price wrote:
>>
>>> So, what do you think [about ,run and ,!]?
>>
>> This is the sort of thing that belongs in a .guile rather than in
>> guile IMO.
>>
>
> Right, and since y
