Hm. Where's the difference to Guile's define? And why do you have
double
parentheses in your example?
Still a bit lost.
hmm...do you read the pasted code in the repo? ;-)
Not yet, I must admit. But nevermind, got it. It looks like a definition
for a parametric func or for a
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 02:28:41PM +0800, Nala Ginrut wrote:
hi Panicz!
On Mon, 2015-06-22 at 22:49 +0200, Panicz Maciej Godek wrote:
My repo is available here:
https://bitbucket.org/panicz/envy/src
Thanks for the hint!
There's tiny
On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 11:12 +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
What does number/base do? Does it change the read syntax of numbers?
I think it defines a function (number/base base) first, then use it as
argument of the outer function...
http://docs.racket-lang.org/reference/define.html
-- t
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 05:19:56PM +0800, Nala Ginrut wrote:
On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 11:12 +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
What does number/base do? Does it change the read syntax of numbers?
I think it defines a function (number/base base)
On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 11:27 +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
Hm. Where's the difference to Guile's define? And why do you have double
parentheses in your example?
Still a bit lost.
hmm...do you read the pasted code in the repo? ;-)
Anyway, it's not standard Scheme grammar, so that's why I
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 05:30:42PM +0800, Nala Ginrut wrote:
On Tue, 2015-06-23 at 11:27 +0200, to...@tuxteam.de wrote:
Hm. Where's the difference to Guile's define? And why do you have double
parentheses in your example?
Still a bit lost.
hi Panicz!
On Mon, 2015-06-22 at 22:49 +0200, Panicz Maciej Godek wrote:
My repo is available here:
https://bitbucket.org/panicz/envy/src
Thanks for the hint!
There's tiny problem IMO, (define ((number/base base) (l ...)) is not
supported in Guile, but I do see something similar in Racket,
