Mikael Djurfeldt writes:
> That sounds great! Can you say something about how much quicker 2.9.1 is
> compared to 2.2?
You can find that by looking at the benchmarks by ecraven:
https://ecraven.github.io/r7rs-benchmarks/
Comparing 2.9 and 2.2 there, you see a 30% reduction in execution time
(
Hi Mike! I'm just here to say, thanks for the work!
Mike Gran 于 2018年11月12日周一 07:52写道：
> Hi-
>
> After a few weeks hacking, I have actually got a library that parses
> GObject-Introspection *.typelib files to create Guile bindings, and I
> have added just enough machinery to get GTK's famous Exa
That sounds great! Can you say something about how much quicker 2.9.1 is
compared to 2.2?
Den sön 11 nov. 2018 21:53 skrev Stefan Israelsson Tampe <
stefan.ita...@gmail.com>:
> Hi,
>
> I've taken 2.9 on a ride with my active code bases, guile-log,
> guile-syntax-parse and python-on -guile.
>
> Ge
Hi,
I've taken 2.9 on a ride with my active code bases, guile-log,
guile-syntax-parse and python-on -guile.
Generelly it's a pleasure as always to work with guile. I can compile all
code and especially the
clpfd code in the prolog part works out nicely (A huge file that takes now
6minutes to comp
