On Sun, 26 Jan 2020, 4:46 pm William ML Leslie, <
william.leslie@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, 26 Jan 2020, 8:20 am John Paul Adrian Glaubitz, <
> glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de> wrote:
>
>> Hi Andy!
>>
>> I noticed that you recently purged hppa support from guile [1].
>>
>
> This change does not
On Sun, 26 Jan 2020, 8:20 am John Paul Adrian Glaubitz, <
glaub...@physik.fu-berlin.de> wrote:
> Hi Andy!
>
> I noticed that you recently purged hppa support from guile [1].
>
This change does not remove hppa support from guile, only support for the
jit.
As an ia64 user, i'm a bit sad that we lo
@Andy Wingo
It's my mistake to call an incompatible constructor after I updated the
interfaces. I think Guile-3 made more strict checking because this mistake
wasn't caught before 2.9.
Now folks may use docker to try Artanis on Guile-3
docker pull registry.gitlab.com/nalaginrut/artanis:latest
B
On 25.01.20 20:48, John David Anglin wrote:
> On 2020-01-25 2:32 p.m., John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
>> I would like to protest this move as it was made without coordination
>> with the hppa porters in Debian. While Debian does not have hppa as a
>> release architecture, it's still a fully maint
On 2020-01-25 2:32 p.m., John Paul Adrian Glaubitz wrote:
> I would like to protest this move as it was made without coordination
> with the hppa porters in Debian. While Debian does not have hppa as a
> release architecture, it's still a fully maintained port with multiple
> developers working on
Hi Andy!
I noticed that you recently purged hppa support from guile [1].
I would like to protest this move as it was made without coordination
with the hppa porters in Debian. While Debian does not have hppa as a
release architecture, it's still a fully maintained port with multiple
developers wo
Here's a simple test:
---mm.scm---
(define-module (mm)
#:use-module ((rnrs) #:select (define-record-type)))
(define-record-type aaa)
(define-record-type bbb)
--end
On Sat, Jan 25, 2020 at 8:51 AM Ludovic Courtès wrote:
> That I understand. However, I was asking for the backtrace of the crash
> on Cygwin when JIT is enabled. Could you grab it?
>
1. The wisdom of the Internet has not been able to figure out how to
generate a core dump on MacOS 10.15.2 (Ca
John Cowan skribis:
> Both Cygwin and MacOS crash in pretty much the same way. By disabling the
> JIT, I was able to get the Cygwin build to run to completion.
That I understand. However, I was asking for the backtrace of the crash
on Cygwin when JIT is enabled. Could you grab it?
Thanks in
