Am Mo., 3. Aug. 2020 um 21:41 Uhr schrieb Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
:
> > I'm sorry to say it, but in my opinion SRFI-121 and SRFI-158 should be
> > deprecated and avoided. The reference implementations do not match the
> > specifications, and the specifications themselves are self-contradictory
> >
On Mon, Aug 3, 2020 at 3:41 PM Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen
wrote:
> It didn't occur to me that the reference implementation of a finalized
> > SRFI would include comments like "the spec would have me return #f, but
> > I think it must simply be wrong".
It certainly should not. But it can happen whe
Am Di., 4. Aug. 2020 um 17:24 Uhr schrieb John Cowan :
>> At the moment,
>> there is no general programmatic way to know whether a specific
>> implementation is up-to-date with respect to these post-finalization
>> notes or not.
>
>
> How could there be? The implementations are written in a Turi
Marc Nieper-Wißkirchen writes:
>>> While I have been contributing to R7RS-large, I have to agree with you
>>> to some extent. Most of the SRFIs that have been voted into R7RS-large
>>> or are to be submitted for it don't have the quality of the R6RS or
>>> R7RS(-small) specifications
>
>> Inevita
