On 11.05.2021 21:14, Taylan Kammer wrote:
>
> And here's another minimally changed one.
>
Aaaand another of course. on IRC notified me that
there's a way in which both the old and new implementation don't
conform to the standard: they're supposed to uninstall the default
test runner that they
I was just skimming through the bug tracker and noticed:
https://bugs.gnu.org/21181
This bug doesn't exist in the proposed implementation.
- Taylan
Hi,
Just a heads-up that the main Guile development branch is now named
"main".
If you have a recent git and a fairly conventional setup, it will be
sufficient to switch your working copy by doing:
git fetch origin
git checkout main
Then you can continue to "git pull" as usual.
One note, t
On 11.05.2021 13:32, Taylan Kammer wrote:
>
> Here's a fixed patch-set.
>
And here's another minimally changed one. Sorry about the noise,
but you know how it goes: you publish something to the public, and
soon after notice another edge or two to polish. :-)
The module definition used to inclu
On 10.05.2021 20:25, Taylan Kammer wrote:
>
> - Improved expand-time performance for large test suites
>
I thought it would be a good idea to quantify this, so I
benchmarked the compilation performance of a test suite
of 289 tests (that of the scheme-bytsetructures library),
and had the followin
While rebasing an old commit on master, I accidentally reinstated the
old implementation's .scm file in the first commit that's supposed to
delete that file. (module/srfi/srfi-64/testing.scm)
Here's a fixed patch-set.
- Taylan
From be7f22e65878f5cb5aa7e94873e4b35ef4ae0032 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 20
