Damien Mattei writes:
> I finished today the first version of Scheme+.
> Scheme+ is an extension of the syntax of the Scheme language.
> Scheme+ makes it easy the assignment of Scheme objects in infix (works also
> in prefix) notation with a few new operators ← (or <-), [ ],⥆ (or <+) .
>
> htt
Tim Van den Langenbergh writes:
> That sounds like a good idea, though I wonder what the best way to organise
> it would be.
>
> IRC, Mattermost, and Rocket Chat seem like the most obvious options
> for chat. I don't know what would be best for task management, maybe
> some out-of-the-box kanban?
Linus Björnstam schreef op ma 20-12-2021 om 09:15 [+0100]:
> I played around with it and it seems to rely heavily on mutation,
> which makes guile (and chez and racket for that matter) box the
> values. That adds a layer of indirection to memory access, meaning
> slower code (apart from the more ob
yes it is based on SRFI-105 as explained in section 7: Features.
The project is based on R6RS (R5RS too) and SRFI for compatibility.
Linus we had a discussion about bindings month ago and Scheme+ take in
account the impossibility in Scheme to have a single operator for defining
a variable anywhere
Hi Damien!
I played around with it and it seems to rely heavily on mutation, which makes
guile (and chez and racket for that matter) box the values. That adds a layer
of indirection to memory access, meaning slower code (apart from the more
obvious problems of continuation safety and threading
On 19/12/2021 21:05, Blake Shaw wrote:
> hi folks, from what I'm seeing here it seems like there are quite a few
> of us who are interested in engaging in steady, organized participation
> in Guile's upkeep, but we're unsure whether we're qualified. At the same
> time Ludo needs to find a replaceme
