Hi Ludo’,
Ludovic Courtès writes:
> I have the pleasure to inform you that I have finally pushed this! :-)
>
> Apologies for taking so long, and thank you for being patient.
Thank you for reviewing and pushing it!
> Some of the suggestions I made earlier¹ were still not implemented
> though:
Hi,
When building from the main branch I see the following error:
guile-readline/Makefile.am:47: error: Libtool library used but 'LIBTOOL' is
undefined
guile-readline/Makefile.am:47: The usual way to define 'LIBTOOL' is to add
'LT_INIT'
guile-readline/Makefile.am:47: to 'configure.ac' and
Hi Arne,
"Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide" skribis:
> From 81e7cbbade4fd01e092a2c39a3af90e4abf7f684 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Arne Babenhauserheide
> Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2024 06:34:52 +0100
> Subject: [PATCH] Add language/wisp, Wisp tests, and SRFI-119 documentation
>
> *
Adding to my previous response:
Most (all?) tests for suspendable/non-suspendable are shared, and run in both
cases, so probably the suspendable get-bytevector-all already has tests.
>Given that ‘get-bytevector-n!’ already has a variant in
suspendable-ports.scm, my preference would be to rewrite
‘get-bytevector-all’ in Scheme (patch attached). That way, it would
naturally be suspendable. (It’s also in line with the general strategy
of moving things to Scheme.)
It currently
Hi Chris,
Christopher Baines skribis:
> I'm looking at this since it's used in (web response)
> read-response-body.
>
> * module/ice-9/suspendable-ports.scm (get-bytevector-all): New
> procedure.
> (port-bindings): Add it.
Given that ‘get-bytevector-n!’ already has a variant in
