ilyPond sources that the attempts to do
>>> it in that manner tended to consist of outdated nontrivially
>>> rearranged parts before getting through peer review
>>> successfully. LilyPond is quite a moving target.
>>>
>>> Ian Hulin has mostly worked on Guilev2
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi Mark,
On 31/01/12 16:10, Mark H Weaver wrote:
> Replying to myself...
>
>> Probably the easiest option here is to simply prepend the
>> desired directories onto the GUILE_LOAD_PATH environment variable
>> before calling scm_boot_guile.
>
> On seco
Hi Andy, Ludo,
I've just seen the add-load-path scheme function in the new git
documentation.
Please, please, pretty please can we have a scm_add_load_path API
equivalent callable from C/C++? The LilyPond initialization code
currently does disgusting things like faking
(eval (set! %load-path cons
ts of the season,
Cheers,
Ian Hulin (LilyPond Guile V2 Migration troll)
Hi Andy,
On 27/04/10 21:34, Andy Wingo wrote:
Hi Ian,
On Fri 02 Apr 2010 02:11, Ian Hulin writes:
On 30/03/10 22:52, Ludovic � wrote:
Lilypond does:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
mod = scm_call_0 (maker);
scm_module_defin
On 02/04/10 10:37, Ludovic � wrote:
Hi Ian,
Ian Hulin writes:
On 30/03/10 22:52, Ludovic � wrote:
Andy Wingo writes:
On Tue 30 Mar 2010 22:56, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
I'm pretty sure that the submodule thing can be changed withou
ompletely and sending patches to the Lilypond/TeXmacs people.
> What do you think?
If you do add scm_set_module_public_interface_x, could you back-port it
to Guile V1.8.6 and V1.8.7?
Those are the lowest versions of Guile the upcoming stable release of
Lilypond will support.
Cheers,
Ian Hulin
Hi Ludo,
On 14/03/10 23:38, Ludovic � wrote:
Hi Patrick,
Patrick McCarty writes:
2010/3/6 Ludovic Courtès:
[...]
| Name | Cause
|
|---+-
ithin the debugger?
Will the new debugger be backwards compatible with (ice-9 debugging) in
V1.8.7?
Cheers,
Ian Hulin
