From 80c6fd67b228ea8685def8ca4305bec9cdd98cd9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
[...]
+@item -e @var{function}
+Make @var{function} the @dfn{entry point} of the script. After loading
+the script file (with @option{-s}) or evaluating the expression (with
+@option{-c}), apply @var{function}
in unrelated files while checking the changes in this patch set.
From 4f69c9dc751408bb89a28f17c289e87de075aca8 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Mark Harig idirect...@aim.com
Date: Mon, 25 Apr 2011 11:33:22 -0400
Subject: [PATCH 1/3] * doc/ref/guile.texi (node Programming in Scheme): Added
menu entry
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 11:00:16PM +0200, Andy Wingo wrote:
Hi Mark,
Thanks for the revisions.
On Sun 24 Apr 2011 22:36, Mark Harig idirect...@aim.com writes:
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 04:33:44PM +0200, Andy Wingo wrote:
your patches should be atomic
3. No patch introduces
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 07:09:07PM -0300, David Pirotte wrote:
While you are at the manual, may I point to some
suggestion I made about the structure and contents of the
indexes which still is, IMHO, valid today. [wanted to
actually really point the email in guile-devel archive but
but it
On Thu 21 Apr 2011 12:21, Wolfgang J Moeller w...@heenes.com writes:
In my browser, searching the Guile Reference Manual
( http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual) Indices
for GUILE_LOAD_COMPILED_PATH ... no hits ...
An open bug, yes; hrm. Adding Mark Harig to the Cc, who had a plan
The date listed on the primary web page for the GNU Guile 1.9.15
release is 2011-01-02 (2011 January 02), instead of the correct date
2011-02-02 (2011 February 02).
http://www.gnu.org/software/guile/
-Original Message-
From: Neil Jerram n...@ossau.uklinux.net
To: Ludovic Courtès
