Hi Mads,
Glad to see I'm not the only person who's building Guile for Windows!
For the gEDA project, which uses Guile quite extensively, we've for
quite some years had a recipe-based cross-build system called "minipack"
that's use for cross-compiling Guile and the geda-gaf electronic design
Hi Andy,
All of this stuff sounds great, and I can't wait for it to be available!
Can I please request an addition to your to-do list: a document that
explains what changes to libguile-using programs will be required?
Getting people from 1.8 to 2.0 is hard enough, and soon Guile will be
*two*
This is going to sound like a daft question, but: is there any reason
that the thread that calls 'touch' needs to be the same thread that
calls its continuation?
I.e. why does there need to be a special main thread? Can't picking
up a job blocking on touch just be another task allocated to the
l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
Hi Peter,
Peter TB Brett pe...@peter-b.co.uk skribis:
This is going to sound like a daft question, but: is there any reason
that the thread that calls 'touch' needs to be the same thread that
calls its continuation?
I.e. why does there need
Daniel Llorens daniel.llor...@bluewin.ch writes:
The only generalized-vector-? function that doesn't have a direct
array-? correspondence is generalized-vector-length. However, even for
arrays of rank 1 it is often convenient to have a function such as
(array-length a) = (car
Andy Wingo wi...@pobox.com writes:
I use git, from the command line and from Emacs. When I use it from
Emacs, I use magit: http://philjackson.github.com/magit/
I mostly use magit to commit, and otherwise the command line to update,
rebase, etc. I use gitk sometimes to get a graphical
Catonano caton...@gmail.com writes:
I copied a patch from my gmail web inerface and pasted in a local file, but I
discovered I had to run dos2unix on it in order to git to process it properly
(see http://stackoverflow.com/questions/1821267/
how-can-i-apply-a-patch-file-in-git) and then I also
David Kastrup d...@gnu.org writes:
* I still wouldn't be surprised if `local-eval' does the wrong thing if
(current-module) is different from what it was when the associated
`primitive-eval' was called.
Before anyone even _defines_ what the right thing would be, there is
little point
